Search for: "State v. Tuttle"
Results 41 - 60
of 98
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
How many states have done that? [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp., 767 F.3d 526 (6th Cir. 2014) (applying Tennessee law); Tuttle v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 12:32 pm
D.C. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
In Glossip v. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 4:45 am
” At the George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket, Peter Smith and Robert Tuttle analyze last week’s decision in Walker v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 2:47 am
” The Court also relisted O’Keefe v. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 3:18 pm
The title of this post comes from this recent paper by Professors Ira Lupu and Robert Tuttle, the abstract of which states: Corporate religious liberty appears to be on the rise. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 4:00 am
From SSRN:Jianlin Chen, Deconstructing the Religious Free Market, (3 Journal of Law, Religion and State 1-24 (2014)).Russell G. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 8:19 pm
P., V. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 2:16 pm
In order even to qualify as a “religious corporation, association, educational institution, or society” eligible for this exemption, an entity must be “primarily religious,” which requires at a minimum that the entity be (i) a nonprofit organization that (ii) is organized for a religious purpose, (iii) is engaged primarily in carrying out that religious purpose, (iv) holds itself out to the public as an entity for carrying out that religious purpose, and (v) does not… [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 1:08 pm
" That is why a unanimous Supreme Court was able to declare, in the 1982 case of U.S. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 4:39 pm
Massachusetts in 1944 to Jimmy Swaggart Ministries v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 4:00 am
Brownstein, Town of Greece v. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 4:20 pm
Piggie Park Enterprises, Inc. (1968), and United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 12:16 am
Hobby Lobby Part IV -- The myth of underinclusivenessHobby Lobby Part V -- Whose Religious Exercise? [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 8:12 am
Tuttle is the David R. and Sherry Kirschner Berz Research Professor of Law and Religion, at George Washington University. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 5:56 am
National Australian Bank Ltd., [1] the Second Circuit’s significant decision in United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 6:09 am
See also Tuttle v. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 10:05 am
See Fischbach v. [read post]
