Search for: "Stephen I. Vladeck" Results 81 - 100 of 225
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2018, 8:04 pm by Howard Bashman
“Our Increasingly Unenforceable Constitution”: Law professor Stephen I. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
Steve Vladeck analyzes the opinion for this blog, and Subscript has a graphic explainer. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 1:16 pm by Andrew Keane Woods
On March 17, the New York Times revealed that Cambridge Analytica, the British data analysis firm with ties to Robert Mercer and Stephen K. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 5:36 am
"An American Held as an ISIS Suspect Deserves a Prompt Hearing": Law professor Stephen I. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 9:32 pm
"The Dangerous Myth of the Judicial 'Resistance'": Dahlia Lithwick and law professor Stephen I. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 12:40 pm by davidruiz
Contractors who offer confidential information to the press—like Reality Winner, who allegedly sent classified information to The Intercept—are still vulnerable under a World War I era law called The Espionage Act. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 7:42 am
"The Long Reach of Guantanamo Bay Military Commissions": Law professor Stephen I. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 6:38 am by Matthew Kahn
Akhil Reed Amar, Yale Law School (Statement) Eric Posner, University of Chicago Law School (Statement) Stephen I. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 2:06 pm by John E. Bies
  As Stephen Vladeck points out, it is not clear that the VRA “applies when the previous officeholder is fired (the statute is triggered when the current officeholder ‘dies, resigns, or is otherwise unable to perform the functions and duties of the office’),” and the moral hazard created by allowing the president wide discretion to make an unreviewable temporary appointment t [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
” PrawfsBlawg has commentary on the decision from Howard Wasserman here, Stephen Sachs here, and Cassandra Roberts [read post]
17 May 2017, 1:45 pm by Guest Blogger
Stephen Vladeck For the symposium on James Pfander, Constitutional Torts and the War on Terror.Jim Pfander’s invaluable new monograph, Constitutional Torts and the War on Terror, arrives at an especially fortuitous moment in the history of the Bivens doctrine—which recognizes circumstances in which judges can recognize a damages remedy for victims of constitutional violations by federal officers even though no statute authorizes such relief. [read post]
11 May 2017, 5:46 am by Michael Froomkin
Nothing worth having says NYT’s Stephen Farrell in ‘I Was There’ Reporting on Airstrikes, the ‘Single Biggest Recruiting Tool’ What did $5 Trillion in war costs buy you? [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 4:51 am by J. Dana Stuster
” Lawfare’s Jack Goldsmith and Stephen Vladeck seconded those concerns in an editorial for CNN. [read post]