Search for: "Sterling Jewelers Inc." Results 21 - 40 of 51
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jan 2014, 6:39 am by Joy Waltemath
Finding no evidence that the EEOC had conducted a nationwide investigation before filing a nationwide pattern-and-practice sex discrimination class action, a federal magistrate in New York recommended granting Sterling Jewelers’ motion for partial summary judgment on the EEOC’s claim of nationwide discrimination (EEOC v Sterling Jewelers Inc, January 2, 2014, McCarthy, J). [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 4:31 pm by rhall@initiativelegal.com
Sterling Jewelers, Inc., 646 F.3d 113 (2d Cir. 2011), which focus on the quite inelastic range of judicial review afforded by the quite clear provisions of Section 10(a)(4) of the FAA and have found an intent to use class arbitration even where the parties’ arbitration agreement does not expressly consent to, or even reference, class arbitration. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 1:57 pm by rhall@initiativelegal.com
Sterling Jewelers Inc., 646 F.3d 113 (2d Cir. 2011), holding that, with no “silence” stipulation, a broadly-drafted arbitration clause constituted an implicit agreement to authorize class treatment. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 7:01 am
Sterling Jewelers, Inc., 646 F.3d 113 (2d Cir. 2011), cert. denied, 132 S. [read post]
20 May 2012, 9:45 am by Barry Barnett
Sterling Jewelers Inc., 646 F.3d 113 (2d Cir. 2011), cert. denied, 132 S. [read post]
18 May 2012, 3:17 pm by Michael Fox
Sterling-Jewelers, Inc. (2nd Cir. 2011), cert. denied Mar. 19, 2012, the 2nd Circuit emphasized the deference to be given to the arbitrator, ultimately concluding that "whether the arbitrator was right or wrong in her analysis, she had the authority to make the decision, and the parties to the arbitration agreement or bound by it. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 6:27 am by Adam Zimmerman
Sterling Jewelers, 646 F.3d 113 (2d Cir. 2011) (upholding an arbitrator’s decision to certify an employment class action in arbitration). [read post]