Search for: "Steven S. Stern"
Results 141 - 160
of 242
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2017, 4:36 am
Commentary comes from Brian Miller at Forbes, who calls the grant “good news for public employees who have been fighting for years for the right to decide for themselves whether or not to support a union,” Mark Joseph Stern at Slate, Ross Runkel at his eponymous blog, and Steven Schwinn at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog, who observes that a ruling against the union in this case will “mark the end of fair share and the likely demise of public sector unions. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 3:49 am
The "Roberts Court" (which is really, right now, the Stevens-Kennedy Court) is clearly a work in progress, not least because of the consequences of the 2008 presidential and Senate elections for who will succeed the now-87-year-old John Paul Stevens and, possibly, the already septagenerians Scalia, Ginsburg, and Kennedy. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 2:00 pm
The Court has pushed back only when, as in 2011’s Stern v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 8:43 am
Discussing yesterday’s decision in Stern v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 10:08 am
Going even further, Slate’s Mark Joseph Stern referred to the decision as “beyond appalling,” while Think Progress’ Ian Millhiser described it as “the most bloodthirsty and cruel death penalty opinion of the modern era. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 3:50 am
” At Slate (via How Appealing), Mark Joseph Stern writes that “[t]hanks to Friday’s order, we now know the Supreme Court will draw the line on the Trump administration’s never-ending crusade for quick wins somewhere. [read post]
7 Dec 2008, 8:18 am
")How to Use: Sechrest is useful outside of the habeas context for its stern language on prosecutorial misconduct. [read post]
20 May 2016, 7:20 am
Commentary comes from Ian Millhiser for Think Progress and Steven Mazie of The Economist. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 4:07 am
” At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie discusses this week’s arguments in “a pair of cases probing the meaning of the Fourth Amendment’s bar on ‘unreasonable searches and seizures’—both involving vehicle privacy—” Byrd v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 6:57 am
Shulman and Steven T. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:11 am
” Steven Mazie of the Economist says Chief Justice John Roberts employed a “pox-on-both-your-houses analysis” before kicking the Mazars subpoenas back to the lower courts. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 10:59 pm
That's a good goal. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 4:18 am
” In The Economist, Steven Mazie observes that “as is so often the case, everything may turn on how Justice Anthony Kennedy sees the executive order. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 4:10 am
” At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie observes that “[t]he justices have bought themselves some time, but they are unlikely to find relief from the question of how far legislatures can go in rigging elections. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 1:01 pm
When Steven Salaita, for example, suggested that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel might appear on television wearing a necklace of children’s teeth, the allusion to ritual child murder was simply shrugged off by his defenders. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:03 am
In The Economist, Steven Mazie calls the argument “a puzzling exercise in interpretative hair-splitting. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 7:04 am
Lee Levine and Stephen Wermiel’s account of the internal history of the Supreme Court’s decision in Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 2:43 pm
Harris and is the magazine’s most memorable cover [read post]
17 May 2010, 5:00 am
Today’s forward thinking companies are gaining the control they need, enhancing transparency and enabling compliance efforts to serve the company’s objectives rather than impede them. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 10:18 am
Steven Johnson Anoka County Sheriff’s Office Tri County Regional Forensic Laboratory 325 East Main Street Anoka, MN 55303-2489 Re: Summary of an onsite visit to Tri County Regional Forensic Laboratory Anoka – Sherburne – Wright Counties BCA Forensic Scientists Dr. [read post]
