Search for: "Stevens v. Target Corporation" Results 121 - 140 of 204
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2009, 12:13 am
They've cited, most recently, the Court's 5-4 decision this year in Ashcroft v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 9:30 pm
 On one hand, two years ago, in United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 6:43 am by Kevin Kaufman
The bill’s revenue thresholds are designed to target large, out-of-state companies (which raises legal issues), but legal and economic incidence are not the same thing. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 6:23 am by INFORRM
In Nicki McLellan v Kent and Sussex Courier, the complaint concerned an article headlined “Saleswoman who targeted doctor’s patients and poor is exposed“. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 8:12 am by Eric Goldman
That type of use is known as “nominative fair use,” and it helps ensure the label on Target’s Up & Up brand shampoo can say “compare to Head and Shoulders®” and the website for Bose headphones can advertise that they are “compatible with most iPod and iPhone models. [read post]