Search for: "Strictly Services, Inc." Results 21 - 40 of 749
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
., Precision Drilling Oilfield Services, Inc., and Precision Drilling Company, LP (“Precision”), an oil rig, for failing to pay them for pre-shift donning and post-shift doffing of personal protective equipment and the associated time spent walking from the rig’s changing house to safety-meeting locations. [read post]
Thus, companies choose to make disclosures related to ESG factors because many investors and consumers want to understand whether the companies in which they invest or from whom they purchase products and services are taking actions—either beneficial or harmful—that may impact corporate stakeholders[5] and, in turn, have an effect on present and/or future shareholder value. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 7:52 am by Dawn Mertineit
While the events forming the basis of the dispute in BioPoint, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 7:36 am by Evan Schwartz
, 495 F.3d 191 (5th Cir. 2007) 5 Peach State Uniform Service, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 9:54 am by Silver Law Group
Morgan Securities LLC   Mulan Greenway   Joshua Lovings   Josette Santos   Wells Fargo Clearing Services, LLC   Harold Stephenson   LPL Financial LLC   Herrmann Securities, Inc. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
The Court acknowledges that significant sections of the ESG Report discuss topics not strictly tied to Defendant's goods and services. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 9:17 am by Eugene Volokh
And it's respectful of the court judgment, even though it's not strictly required by the judgment. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 5:08 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
Stahle Construction Inc., the appellant employer was a general contractor in the construction industry. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 5:08 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
Stahle Construction Inc., the appellant employer was a general contractor in the construction industry. [read post]
17 May 2023, 3:49 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
 . founded upon documentary evidence” under that provision expired with service of their answer (see CPLR 3211 [e]). [read post]
12 May 2023, 11:45 am by Ben Sperry
Conduits—like the telephone company—were on the other end of the spectrum, and could not be held liable for the speech of those who used their services. [read post]
4 May 2023, 5:16 am by Daphne Keller
Similarly, in Denver Area Educational Telecommunications Consortium, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 12:28 am by Florian Mueller
For instance, the PI motion must show an "immediate" danger, but then the analysis of other aspects will be less elaborate.The class-action lawyers--potentially with help from their Sony-counsel friends--now know Microsoft's "no irreparable harm" argument (which was foreseeable from the beginning: even if the gamers were right, they'd just have to buy an Xbox (half of them already own one) and pay a little more for games and subscription services, which is just… [read post]