Search for: "Sue Ritz"
Results 1 - 20
of 25
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2023, 2:25 pm
In general, a litigant cannot sue for another person’s injury. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 7:58 am
By Atreya Mathur With the advent of technology, artificial intelligence, new means to create art, and the many copyright, contractual, and ownership issues that arise from it all, it’s interesting to think about what creatives can do with the law and without it to protect better (or monetize) their work. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 2:24 am
An Ohio consumer was traveling in Illinois, and on August 2 he bought some groceries at a local Target store only to discover after he checked out that he was overcharged for two boxes of Ritz crackers. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 12:13 pm
The judge that initially dismissed the lawsuit did so because the man could not sue on behalf of diners for restaurants he was never at nor did his claims meet the $5 million minimum for a class-action lawsuit. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 5:30 am
Pruitt probably did weep after the Ritz-Carlton ran out of his favorite moisturizer, but that’s not at all the same thing. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 3:56 pm
., on February 29, 2012, in the early morning hours, two special agents from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) together with representatives from the Federal Bureau of Investigation visited his home at the Ritz Carlton and demanded an interview. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 12:04 pm
Thus, Ritz Camera is free to sue SanDisk for attempting to exert monopoly power through the use of fraudulently obtained patents. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 12:57 am
Krystal RiceOriginal Article 04/23/2012 By Erica Ritz Deputy Krystal Rice, from Watertown, New York, is suing her co-workers for $50 million after topless photos she agreed to take as part of a sting operation against pedophiles were allegedly passed around the office, and her superiors reportedly began harassing and “isolating” her. - Why in the world would anybody agree to take photos of themselves topless for something like this? [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 7:16 am
The Court found that the Ritz Cracker Cutting Machine was equipment Nabisco had manufactured specially for cutting Ritz crackers, it was used solely by Nabisco employees, and later used solely by Kraft employees; it was not available to the public at large. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 1:59 am
The co-op markets retail under Sue Bee, Clover Maid, Aunt Sue, Natural Pure and many store brands.Eric Wenger, director of quality services for Golden Heritage Foods, the nation's third largest packer, said his company takes every precaution not to buy laundered Chinese honey. [read post]
13 May 2011, 9:15 am
I'm at the Network of Trial Law Firms conference in Naples, FL, where 67 defense litigators are meeting at the Ritz-Carlton with 67 GCs and In-house counsel. [read post]
11 May 2011, 5:28 pm
Ritz Camera & Image v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 4:14 pm
In Ritz Camera & Image, LLC v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 9:19 am
If you had a law similar to the one in Illinois in your state, would you sue? [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 7:24 am
(The case was filed on Friday, so presumably the complaint hasn’t been uploaded yet; if and when it does, please feel free to post the link in the comments.)UPDATE (11 AM): You can access a copy of Lauren Serafin’s complaint via On Point, which (1) notes the additional allegation that Robert Leighton breached the “duty of implied fidelity” with a woman in Vegas named “Danielle” and (2) analyzes the merits of Serafin’s various causes of action (including… [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 8:11 pm
Ritz Camera & Image v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 8:32 am
National laws differ significantly in terms of whether a modern claimant to such art could successfully sue. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 7:24 pm
In response to our motion to dismiss for improper venue, the plaintiff took the position that the clause was not mandatory but merely permissive; that it specified Virginia state court as one of several permissible venues, rather than the only place a party could sue. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 6:24 pm
In response to our motion to dismiss for improper venue, the plaintiff took the position that the clause was not mandatory but merely permissive; that it specified Virginia state court as one of several permissible venues, rather than the only place a party could sue. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 12:01 am
March 9, 2009).The Ritz (London, England)On January 7, 2005, The Ritz Hotel, Ltd. [read post]
