Search for: "Sullivan v. Social Security Administration"
Results 41 - 60
of 75
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2018, 11:28 am
They could frustrate government responses to social problems in a way not seen in America since the Great Depression. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am
Sullivan, 559 N.W.2d 740, 747 (Neb. 1997) (dictum), followed in Nolan v. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 12:42 am
According to corporate finance experts at the law firm of Sullivan and Cromwell, the 2011 SEC CF Guidance jump-started a new era of cyber-disclosure in public company filings, which most public companies have now already integrated into their SEC disclosure processes: “Following the [2011 SEC CF Guidance’s] Release, many public companies included additional cybersecurity-related disclosures in their annual and quarterly reports, often in the form of risk factors, as well… [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 10:48 pm
Please post a comment here or on one of our social media pages. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 5:37 pm
Access to recorded classes will be controlled via a secure course management platform, such as ANGEL, and will be restricted to students enrolled in the recorded course, the professor, and those University IIT personnel necessary to maintain the system. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 5:51 am
Berge v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 12:46 pm
If Congress really viewed contraceptive coverage as a compelling it would not have left it to the vagaries of the administrative process, which are subject to political change from administration to administration. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 12:32 pm
” The purpose of the First Amendment,Sullivan says, is “to assure unfettered interchange of ideas for the bringing about of political and social changes desired by the people. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 12:52 pm
On October 20, 2011, I reported in a blog article, "Migraines and Social Security Disability" that the Social Security Administration, in a question and answer type publication in 2009, required a very specific diagnosis from a physician in order that migraines be considered a “medically determinable impairment”. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 12:52 pm
On October 20, 2011, I reported in a blog article, “Migraines and Social Security Disability” that the Social Security Administration, in a question and answer type publication in 2009, required a very specific diagnosis from a physician in order that migraines be considered a “medically determinable impairment”. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 11:35 am
Related Cases: Jewel v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 2:37 pm
Social Security Disability Miller, Warnecke and student Rebecca Griffin. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 3:00 am
** The County contended that Retirement and Social Security Law §605 provides an alternate basis upon which it could apply for retirement benefits on White's behalf, but it did not make an application pursuant to that section. [read post]
27 May 2012, 5:42 pm
Lineker denied saying this and secured a clarification in the paper on page two. [read post]
24 May 2012, 5:41 am
Additionally, Reliance demanded Hardt pay $14,913.23 to offset the disability benefits she had received from the Social Security Administration as required by a plan provision which coordinated benefits with Social Security payments. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 12:43 pm
Lynn Winmill had relied incorrectly on a 1989 Supreme Court decision that dealt with “a very unusual type of social security case” (Sullivan v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 7:42 am
A primary drafter of the Bolivian Social Security pension privatization law, Ms. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:17 am
Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964). [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:53 am
Justice Eakin’s most memorable dissent I’m aware of was in Porreco v. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 6:11 am
This requirement will be enforced through an unusual administrative sanction. [read post]
