Search for: "Sun v. Holder"
Results 1 - 20
of 191
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Inst. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 2:35 am
Sun Hong, Partner Hong Kong There is no overarching regulatory framework targeting D&I in the financial services sector, although a number of specific regulatory developments indicate that financial services regulatory and supervisory bodies in Hong Kong are focussing on D&I. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 2:21 am
By Sara W. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 12:01 pm
© McMillan LLP 2023 The post Is the Sun Setting on Perceived DAO “Immunity”? [read post]
26 May 2023, 6:15 am
The transaction raised eyebrows due to Sun’s ties to the CCP and his former military service with the People’s Liberation Army (PLA). [read post]
9 May 2023, 9:01 pm
There is reason to believe the SEC’s new universal proxy Rule 14a-19 will result in more stockholder nominees being elected to the boards of public companies. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 5:32 am
Sun[15]). [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 12:29 pm
A trademark application filing and fee payment with the national or regional office can secure a trademark and usually lasts ten years unless the holder renews by paying additional fees. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 4:33 pm
Sanofi (C-443/12), Georgetown University v. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 9:39 am
By transferring the NFT between wallets, the NFT holders were able to remove the public listing and avoid the fee associated with its cancellation. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 4:15 pm
The Guardian, Sun, Sky News and Express cover the announcement. [read post]
27 Aug 2022, 11:02 am
The prevailing wisdom is that federal agencies cannot generally disclose trade secrets and confidential information given to them in confidence by companies that they regulate or work with. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 8:26 am
., Ltd v The NOCO Company, a case on battery-powered car jump starters. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 7:15 am
This was a claim for revocation of European Patent (UK) 2 373 755 (“the Patent”) by Saint-Gobain (“SG”). 3M was the holder of the patent, which was titled “Dish-shaped abrasive particles with a recessed surface” and had a priority date of 17 December 2008. [read post]
22 Mar 2022, 4:38 am
“ As regards the 3(c) issue, this provision has been largely left undisturbed since the rulings of the court in Sanofi v Actavis[2] and Boehringer Ingelheim v Actavis[3] which held that even if Article 3(a) was satisfied, in circumstances where a basic patent included a claim to a product comprising an active ingredient which constituted the sole subject matter of the invention and for which the holder of that patent had already obtained an SPC as well as a… [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 12:44 am
The report mentions that there is only one precedent rendered over five years ago in Japan, in 2013 in Apple v Samsung. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 7:22 am
"[17] [V.] [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
In Holder v. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 9:41 am
"] From Friday's decision in Soukaneh v. [read post]
2 May 2021, 1:14 pm
(…) Sega Enterprises Ltd. v. [read post]
