Search for: "Sun v. Holder" Results 61 - 80 of 191
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2016, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
” Next up is Lightfoot v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 5:08 am by Larry Tolchinsky
To read about that case and how it has been cited in Florida precedent, Cone Bros Construction Co. v Moore, 141 Fla. 420, 193 So. 288 (1940) go here. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 6:50 am by Adam Chandler
Holder, a challenge to the way in which the United States interprets immigration laws about drug infractions. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 9:19 pm
Hugh Hansen’s lecture on Copyright and Public Domain, former guest kat Alberto adopts a Liebniz-wise approach to portray current relations between copyright holders and the rest of the world [copyright not-holder and copyright haters]. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 12:43 am
PatentsIn Takeda v Roche: "Is it plausible? [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 7:15 am by David Hemming (Bristows)
This was a claim for revocation of European Patent (UK) 2 373 755 (“the Patent”) by Saint-Gobain (“SG”). 3M was the holder of the patent, which was titled “Dish-shaped abrasive particles with a recessed surface” and had a priority date of 17 December 2008. [read post]
9 Dec 2018, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
The Blog considered the ongoing case of Strike 3 Holdings in its efforts to subpoena the identity of an ISP holder in order to serve a claim against hm. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 5:29 am
 * Coty v Stadtsparkasse: BGH rules in the wake of CJEU decisionOn past Wednesday, the German Bundesgerichthof ruled that a bank is obliged to disclose the identity of the holder of an account into which the proceeds of the sale of a counterfeit product were deposited to the owner of the counterfeit trade mark. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 5:33 am by Amy Howe
” Briefly: In an op-ed for the Baltimore Sun, Amanda Frost discusses last week’s decision in the immigration case Scialabba v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 5:01 pm
 In an interview with Ars Technica in 2013 following their Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) win in the Soverain "online shopping cart" case, Newegg's Chief Legal Officer Lee Cheng stated:"We basically took a look at this situation and said, 'This is bull***. '  We saw that if we paid off this patent holder, we'd have to pay off every patent holder this same amount. [read post]