Search for: "Super Privacy, LTD"
Results 41 - 60
of 92
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2024, 4:13 pm
If 2010 was the year of libel reform, the focus in 2011 moved to privacy, The first half of 2011 saw the “Super-Injunction spring”. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 8:56 am
Session: 3C - Friday at 2:15 p.m: Building Responsible Digital Communities Moderator: Dean McCabe, Brookfield Residential Services Ltd. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 4:43 pm
If 2010 was the year of libel reform, the focus in 2011 moved to privacy, The first half of 2011 saw the “Super-Injunction spring”. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 10:34 am
Take away the “Ltd. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:31 am
It is entitled “End of week media law mop up: Ian Tomlinson inquest; super injunction rumours; and Cameron defence of PCC” Journalism and the PCC We posted last week on David Cameron’s comments on privacy on the “Today” programme. [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 6:31 am
In contrast, former editor, Roy Greenslade, is concerned about some of the press reaction to privacy cases, suggesting that journalists who support a privacy law have “taken leave of their senses”. [read post]
10 Apr 2016, 4:05 pm
’ In the field of media law, this week has seen a return to the media hysteria of the “super-injunction” spring of 2011. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 2:30 am
In general privacy cases are about, well, privacy – not sponsorship. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 5:20 pm
News Privacy injunctions have, once again, been in the news this week. [read post]
27 Nov 2016, 4:06 pm
Northern Ireland The Belfast Telegraph has reported that the number of super-injunctions in Northern Ireland has reached its highest level in ten years. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 4:32 pm
Super. 524, 553 (App. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 5:02 pm
Although the order in ZAM was unusual it was not a “super-injunction” (it did not prohibit reference to the proceedings) and did not directly concern privacy. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 4:13 pm
Rather you would take it for what it is – a clash of fundamental rights, the right to reputation on the one hand, perhaps privacy to some extent, and freedom of expression on the other. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 3:17 am
French-Google partnership may blossom (IPKat) Germany Judge jeopardizes DigiProtect anti-piracy cash operation (TorrentFreak) Italy Court of Bergamo rules that Italian ISPs must block customer access to The Pirate Bay (TorrentFreak) Norway Pirate movie privacy case set for the Supreme Court (TorrentFreak) Court rejects IFPI appeal for ISP Telenor to block The Pirate Bay (TorrentFreak) South Africa Life is too short – novel cybersquatting threat, positive… [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 7:30 pm
Meanwhile, PCC Chair Baroness Buscombe gave a speech to the Westminster Media Forum on regulating privacy and online media, defending the role of the PCC in general and its privacy decisions in particular. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 5:50 pm
This was the week of the “Super Tuesday” of Parliamentary Committees. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm
The Guardian had a piece on the report entitled House of Lords report calls for digital super-regulator. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 4:33 pm
Television [update] On 7 December 2010 at 7.30pm on ITV1: “Can You Keep a Secret”: Mary Nightingale charts the rise of super-injunctions, asking to what extent they protect privacy and limit Press freedom. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 4:04 pm
The Court of Appeal decision in Leech -v- Independent Newspapers (Ireland) Ltd [2017] IECA 8 is now available. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 5:05 pm
That view has since been upheld by the Court of Appeal in Johnson v Medical Defence Union [2007] EWCA Civ 262, although the narrowness of this interpretation was queried (without ruling) by the same court in another privacy case, Murray v Big Pictures (UK) Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 446. [read post]
