Search for: "Supervisor #1 alleged, & #2"
Results 61 - 80
of 2,118
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2021, 2:17 pm
In addition to renewing its prior arguments, CSBS alleges that the OCC lacks authority to issue Nonbank Charters to uninsured depository institutions because Section 2 of the Federal Reserve Act (FRA) requires a national bank that receives deposits to be FDIC-insured. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 7:28 pm
Scott Medical Center, is case No. 2:16-cv-00225-CB). [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
A police detective [Petitioner] was served with disciplinary charges alleging he had anonymously filed a false allegation of misconduct targeting one of his supervisors with the police department's [Department] Internal Affairs Bureau [IAB]. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 12:00 am
A police detective [Petitioner] was served with disciplinary charges alleging he had anonymously filed a false allegation of misconduct targeting one of his supervisors with the police department's [Department] Internal Affairs Bureau [IAB]. [read post]
22 May 2017, 7:42 am
(“Ahmed I”), No. 1:14-cv-04595, mem. order at 1 (E.D.N.Y., Mar. 31, 2016). [read post]
23 Jun 2013, 10:19 am
Such evidence may be may be admitted and considered when [1] it is offered for a different reason or another purpose; [2] where prior violations have independent relevance and [3] the fact-finder is an attorney or a judge trained to consider potentially prejudicial evidence introduced for limited purposes. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 10:24 am
He brought a class action against Starbucks alleging that the company’s policy permitting shift supervisors to share in tips that customers place in a collective tip box violated Labor Code section 351 and California Unfair Competition Law. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 1:20 pm
When the alleged harasser is in a supervisory position over the plaintiff, the objectionable conduct is automatically imputed to the employer. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
her membership in a protected class and qualification for the position," she failed to [1] "adequately allege that she was treated differently or worse than her colleagues of other races, religions, and national origins under similar circumstances" and [2] "that the treatment occurred under circumstances giving rise to an inference of discrimination. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
her membership in a protected class and qualification for the position," she failed to [1] "adequately allege that she was treated differently or worse than her colleagues of other races, religions, and national origins under similar circumstances" and [2] "that the treatment occurred under circumstances giving rise to an inference of discrimination. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 3:39 pm
” Id. at 2. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 3:39 pm
” Id. at 2. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 12:43 pm
LEXIS 17191, at *1 (3d Cir. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 7:30 am
Sustaining the Supreme Court's decision, the Appellate Division explained that to state a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress in such an action a party must allege: 1. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 7:30 am
Sustaining the Supreme Court's decision, the Appellate Division explained that to state a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress in such an action a party must allege: 1. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 9:01 pm
Lower courts took wildly divergent views in the cases that followed, disagreeing about (1) whether and how to differentiate between harassment by co-workers and harassment by supervisors, (2) how much weight to give an employer’s policies against harassment, and (3) whether and how to penalize victims who have failed to make use of available grievance procedures. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 6:26 pm
” 2. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 3:56 am
An act is within the scope of employment if (1) it was expressly or impliedly directed by the employer or is naturally incident to the business, and (2) it was performed with the intent to further the employer's interest. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 12:08 pm
Almonte’s whistleblower letter, sent to the SEC by her law firm Kyros & Pressly on November 30, 2010, includes allegations that: 1. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 2:09 pm
Fred’s Inc., 4th Cir., No. 09-1265, 4/1/10, the 4th Circuit held that the test to determine whether a harasser is a supervisor is whether the “complained-of conduct was ‘aided by’ the agency relationship between the alleged harasser and employer” and not simply whether the harasser had the power to take “tangible employment action” against the complainant, as determined by the lower court. [read post]
