Search for: "Supervisor #1 alleged, & #2" Results 101 - 120 of 2,112
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2023, 9:35 am by Chris Sutton
Two different California federal juries entered verdicts in favor of Diaz, with the jury on retrial finding, among other things, that (1) Tesla supervisors and coworkers had subjected Diaz to a racially hostile work environment; (2) Tesla had violated Diaz’s civil rights under 42 U.S.C. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 7:00 am by Jennifer Reinhardt
 Following Patterson’s initial complaints of her supervisor’s misconduct, the department launched an investigation into her allegations and found that although Patterson’s supervisor did in fact have an inappropriate relationship with another employee in violation of the department’s internal policy, there was no evidence to support preferential treatment. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 7:11 am by Joy Waltemath
An FLSA collective action for overtime pay by employees of a satellite installer who were classified as managers or supervisors was decertified by a federal district court in Illinois after it determined that they were not similarly situated (Hundt v DirectSat USA, LLC, July 1, 2013, Gottschall, J). [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 4:49 pm by Patricia Salkin
Here, EMAC’s amended complaint alleged that the Board discriminated against it by rejecting its application for an extension of CUP–2–12 for the southern sign while granting Northlake’s extension request of CUP–2–12 for the northern sign. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 7:46 am by Adam Santucci
The Court's "cat's paw" theory requires a showing that: (1) a supervisor; (2) acting within the scope of his or her employment; (3) performed an act that was motivated by discrimination; (4) which was intended by the supervisor to cause an adverse employment action; and (5) the act was a proximate cause of the adverse employment action. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 1:23 pm by Nassiri Law
  All of the women also allege that supervisors and other employees tried to kiss them. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 2:44 pm by Adam Weinstein
FINRA alleged that the firm’s brokers sold VAs both in branch offices where a registered branch manager was onsite as well as in offices where there was no onsite supervisor. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 9:26 am
  Applying the "economic reality" test, whether a person functions as an employer depends on the totality of the circumstances rather than on "technical concepts of the employment relationship," including: (1) whether the individual had the power to hire and fire the employee; (2) supervised and controlled employee work schedules or conditions of employment; (3) determined the rate and method of payment; and (4) maintained employment records. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Kelly, OATH Index No. 516/19 A New York City city planner was served with disciplinary charges pursuant to §75 of the Civil Service Law alleging multiple instances of insubordination, incompetence, and calling 911 to have police respond to an incident with her supervisor. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Kelly, OATH Index No. 516/19 A New York City city planner was served with disciplinary charges pursuant to §75 of the Civil Service Law alleging multiple instances of insubordination, incompetence, and calling 911 to have police respond to an incident with her supervisor. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 5:53 am
It's a Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) case that touches on two important issues: 1. when a supervisor can be individually liable under the FMLA; and 2. whether a supervisor at a public agency can be individually liable under the FMLA. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 3:19 am by Lauren M. Krueger, of Felhaber Larson
Tori filed a lawsuit against Regus under the Minnesota Human Rights Act (MHRA) and Title VII alleging (1) quid pro quo sexual harassment, (2) a hostile work environment, and (3) retaliation. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 3:19 am by Lauren M. Krueger, of Felhaber Larson
Tori filed a lawsuit against Regus under the Minnesota Human Rights Act (MHRA) and Title VII alleging (1) quid pro quo sexual harassment, (2) a hostile work environment, and (3) retaliation. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 12:14 am by fl_litig8r
If the employer (1) has a written harassment policy informing employees of their right to file complaints and (2) the employee fails to use this policy to notify the employer of the supervisor’s harassment, the employer can avoid liability. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 1:54 pm by Adam Santucci
An employer is not subject to strict liability for a supervisor's conduct where the employer can show that (1) the employer took reasonable measures to prevent harassment and promptly correct it when it occurred and (2) the employee failed to take advantage of established mechanisms for filing complaints. [read post]