Search for: "Supreme Builders"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,018
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2011, 10:50 pm
Clair County Home Builders Association v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 6:30 am
Supreme Court (in 1904). [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 12:00 pm
We've often seen this issue in the "no good deed goes unpunished" situation where a contractor steps in to perform repair work on a builders risk policy and the carrier refuses to pay the contractor's overhead and profit. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 10:02 am
Supreme Court to review the California Court of Appeal's decision in Charles A. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 7:11 am
Supreme Court denied review in City of Milwaukee Post No. 2874 Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 5:01 pm
Recently, the Virginia Supreme Court addressed an appeal stemming from personal injuries a family suffered when mold developed in their new home. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 12:43 pm
Heritage Builders, No. 16SA193, 2017 CO 13 (Colo. [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 12:35 pm
Based primarily on these differences in payroll deduction obligations, the Colorado Supreme Court recently granted a petition in the case of Chronos Builders, LLC vs. the Colorado Department of Labor & Employment, Division of Family and Medical Leave Insurance to decide whether the Act violates the Colorado Taxpayer Bill of Rights (TABOR). [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 10:28 am
Unless and until Oregon’s Supreme Court or Court of Appeals issues a contrary decision, the Ninth Circuit’s opinion in MW Builders should provide a sound basis for apportionment arguments in Oregon. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 10:12 am
The Colorado Supreme Court did away with the repair doctrine in 2010 when it issued its decision in Smith v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 6:30 am
In GRANTING FD Sprinkler's and Woodworks' motions, New York County Supreme Court Justice Doris Ling-Cohan ruled that each had an insurable interest in the damaged property, and thus were insured under Chelsea's builder's risk policy with St. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 6:46 pm
No. 356 Nova Scotia Supreme Court S.M. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 9:40 am
The Florida Supreme Court just confirmed the legal victory of Ansbacher Law’s client Heron’s Landing Condominium Association over “America’s Builder” […] The post A Huge Win For Ansbacher Law Against “America’s Largest Homebuilder” appeared first on Ansbacher Law. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 6:41 am
The court granted Builders’ motion. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 10:50 am
The Supreme Court will take up a challenge to the Clean Water Act that could narrow the law’s reach in ways long sought by businesses and home builders.The justices said Monday that they will consider, probably in the term beginning in October, a long-running dispute involving an Idaho couple who already won once at the Supreme Court in an effort to build a home near Priest Lake. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 9:58 pm
Breedlove, 377 S.C. 415, 661 S.E.2d 67, the SC Supreme Court held that a private individual who built a home as his personal residence, acting as his own general contractor, was not considered the builder or general contractor when a subsequent buyer sued for breach of implied warranty of workmanlike service. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 11:05 pm
Breedlove, 377 S.C. 415, 661 S.E.2d 67, the SC Supreme Court held that a private individual who built a home as his personal residence, acting as his own general contractor, was not considered the builder or general contractor when a subsequent buyer sued for breach of implied warranty of workmanlike service. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 4:41 pm
Millennium Builders Inc. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 10:34 am
Since 1985, the Iowa Supreme Court has recognized an implied warranty of workmanlike construction for homeowners. [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 4:00 am
Supreme Advocacy LLP offers a weekly electronic newsletter, Supreme Advocacy Letter, to which you may subscribe. [read post]
