Search for: "Suzanna Sherry" Results 1 - 20 of 117
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2024, 3:34 pm by David Bernstein
That these related movements have now exposed their antisemitism publicly is no surprise: antisemitism is bred in their bones.The post Suzanna Sherry on DEI/Critical Race Theory and Antisemitism appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 7:01 am by Randy E. Barnett
[My seminar picks for 2023 (and every year since 2005).] [read post]
27 Nov 2022, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
  The most well-known group of anti-theorists are the pragmatists, including RIchard Posner as well as the so-called "prairie pragmatists," Daniel Farber and Suzanna Sherry. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
Introduction Constitutional discourse in both the academy and the public sphere has recently included quite a bit of talk about "originalism. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 3:30 am by Lumen N. Mulligan
Suzanna Sherry, Our Kardashian Court (and How to Fix it), 106 Iowa L. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 2:29 pm by Randy E. Barnett
[My seminar picks for 2022 (and every year since 2005)] Every year, I teach a seminar called Recent Books on the Constitution. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 10:08 am by Will Baude
The facts are a somewhat dramatic story of a Pissarro painting looted by the Nazis that is now in a Spanish museum (here's a case preview by Suzanna Sherry). [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 5:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Today I'll take as my point of departure the amicus brief with which I'm most familiar--one filed on behalf of me and 12 other constitutional law scholars (Lee Bollinger, Erwin Chemerinsky, Sherry Colb, Dan Farber, Joanna Grossman, Leah Litman, Martha Minow, Jane Schacter, Suzanna Sherry, Geof Stone, David Strauss, and Larry Tribe).The core of our argument goes like this: Mississippi is plainly wrong in its contention that the abortion right has no connection to… [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 6:31 am by Howard Wasserman
This is a response to Suzanna Sherry's Our Kardashian Court (And How to Fix It), which argues that the solution to judicial celebrity is to require the Court to issue on per curiam opinion with no separate opinions or vote counts. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 8:16 am by Howard Wasserman
The new Courts Law essay comes from Sergio Campos (Miami), discussing the Civil Procedure Unavailability Workshop, a remote civ pro workshop that Suzanna Sherry (Vanderbilt) and Adam Steinman (Alabama) established late last spring. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 3:30 am by Sergio J. Campos
I want to highlight a particularly pleasant surprise for civil procedure scholars—the Civil Procedure Unavailability Workshop (the “Workshop”), a virtual workshop organized by Suzanna Sherry and Adam Steinman that has met weekly this summer and will continue monthly in the fall. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 7:10 pm by Amanda Frost
The last section of Oldfather’s paper discusses the court’s celebrity culture — a phenomenon recently addressed by Suzanna Sherry and Richard Hasen, among others. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 8:40 am by Randy E. Barnett
[My seminar picks for this year (and every year since 2005)] Every year, I teach a seminar called Recent Books on the Constitution. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 6:31 am by Howard Wasserman
Suzanna Sherry (Vanderbilt) and Adam Steinman (Alabama) have organized a new remote Civil Procedure Workshop Series, hosted by and modeled on the Evidence Workshop run by Ed Cheng at Vanderbilt). [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 11:34 am by Adam Steinman
With everyone stuck at home, Suzanna Sherry and I are starting a new Civil Procedure workshop, modeled on (and administered through the website of) Ed Cheng’s Unavailability Workshops on Evidence. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 6:31 am by Howard Wasserman
And it seems to me that Dane's discussion meshes with Suzanna Sherry's argument for eliminating signed opinions (per curiam majority opinions, no concurrences or dissents). [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 6:58 am by Adam Feldman
In a recent article, Professor Suzanna Sherry proposed not only eliminating dissents and separate opinions altogether, but also ending the practice of justices’ signing their names to opinions in order to do away with, or at least minimize, the celebrity status bestowed upon Supreme Court justices. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 7:00 am by Amanda Frost
Yes, says Vanderbilt Law Professor Suzanna Sherry in her recent article, “Our Kardashian Court (and How to Fix It). [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 12:20 pm by John Mikhail
  As Suzanna Sherry observes in her contribution to the symposium, one main impetus of A Great Power of Attorney appears to be defending a narrow theory of government power on originalist grounds. [read post]