Search for: "Suzlon Energy A/S"
Results 1 - 15
of 15
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2011, 3:00 am
Today’s case of the day, Suzlon Energy Ltd. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 4:35 pm
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani] Suzlon Energy Ltd. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 5:56 am
Suzlon Energy Ltd. demanded Microsoft to produce emails from the Hotmail email account of Rajagopalan Sridhar, an Indian citizen imprisoned abroad. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 7:58 am
According to Suzlon Energy Ltd. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 11:17 am
Suzlon Energy, Ltd. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 11:10 am
In Suzlon Energy Ltd. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 11:46 pm
The Board found the similarity between the marks to be "not great," in large part because of the inclusion of the word SUZLON in the challenged mark. [read post]
27 Apr 2008, 5:59 pm
UTIVF's original investment in the company was only Rs 2.5 crore (in 2000) or $600,000.The previous higher exit multiples include about 26-30X in Suzlon Energy by ChrysCapital and Citigroup Venture Capital, 25X in Mphasis by Baring Private Equity and Gaja Capital Partner's 22X in another e-learning company Educomp Solutions. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 10:05 am
To the contrary, the Ninth Circuit decided in another Microsoft case in 2011, Suzlon Energy Ltd. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2021, 5:30 am
Suzlon Energy LTD., 2010 WL 3749279, at *5 (N.D. [read post]
4 May 2009, 5:56 pm
Suzlon Energy acquired Hansen Group through a deal of $565 million. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 4:40 am
http://bit.ly/nWotnF (Jeffrey Klein, Nicolas Pappas) ECPA Protects Non-Citizen Communications Stored in the US – Suzlon Energy v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 4:40 am
http://bit.ly/nWotnF (Jeffrey Klein, Nicolas Pappas) ECPA Protects Non-Citizen Communications Stored in the US – Suzlon Energy v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 4:59 am
http://bit.ly/nWotnF (Jeffrey Klein, Nicolas Pappas) ECPA Protects Non-Citizen Communications Stored in the US – Suzlon Energy v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
The conflicts are most acute when one country’s legal prohibitions on producing data in response to surveillance directives cannot be squared with another country’s legal compulsions to do so. [read post]
