Search for: "Swift Transportation Services LLC"
Results 1 - 18
of 18
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2014, 6:21 am
Under a proposed settlement agreement filed with the court Monday, April 21, giant truckload carrier Swift Transportation Company would pay $4.4 million to resolve class allegations that it violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act in its handling of criminal background checks for online applicants (Ellis, III v Swift Transportation Co of Arizona, LLC, ED VA). [read post]
7 May 2008, 10:07 pm
The breakdown of violations in the Arizona report is as follows:Types of Out-Of-Service Violations in Arizona in 2006:False Report of Driver Record of Duty Status - 2,818Inspection/Repair & Maintenance - 2,674Driver Fail to Retain Previous 7 Days Logs - 1,500No Driver's Record of Duty Status - 1,39615 Hour Rule Violation - 1,357Brake Out of Adjustment - 1,194Inoperative/Defective Brakes - 98010 Hour Rule Violation - 921No or Improper Load Securement - 717Flat Tire or Fabric… [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 9:03 pm
The charges were for transporting uninspected meat and unauthorized use of the USDA mark of inspection. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 7:05 am
Giant truckload carrier Swift Transportation Company is facing a class action lawsuit alleging that it violated the FCRA when, without the authorization of non-in-person applicants, it obtained copies of consumer reports, including criminal backgrounds checks, and relied upon them in taking adverse employment actions against the applicants without notifying them of their rights under the FCRA (Ellis, III v Swift Transportation Co, LLC, E.D. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 12:36 pm
* Is UberPOP a transport service? [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 1:42 pm
Earlier this year, Swift Transportation Company agreed to pay $4.4 million to resolve a class complaint alleging that it violated the FCRA by failing to obtain the authorization of online applicants before having criminal background checks run and then relied on the results to take adverse actions without notifying the applicants of their rights (Ellis, III v Swift Transportation Co of Arizona). [read post]
9 May 2022, 9:37 am
Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC, 8 F.4th 690 (8th Cir. 2021). [2] There is some question in later cases as to whether there could be a protectable interest for a low-level and/o [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 12:02 pm
[#Energy/LNG]Waste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 8:39 am
., LLC v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 3:42 am
© 2011 Simple Justice NY LLC. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 2:31 pm
(Hat tip to Professor Michael McChrystal, who brought the increasing relevance of airships to my attention in a recent conversation.) [1] See PPL Montana, LLC v. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 9:19 am
Swift & Co., 323 U.S. 134, 140 (1944); (2) whether the opinion of the U.S. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 2:04 pm
Green Tree Servicing, LLC v. [read post]
2 May 2024, 5:59 am
Surgical services include spay-neuter services, general surgery, and dental care. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 3:35 am
Anderson created a company called Empery Resource Consultants, LLC, in order to create fake services by its landmen that were billed to two companies that were buying or leasing interests in Texas oil and gas properties. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 8:03 am
The Department of Transportation’s Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) is soliciting public comment on a proposed revision of its current hours-of-service (HOS) regulations, which limit the operating hours of commercial truck drivers. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 6:21 pm
Thus, a one-year budgetary cycle might not be swift or agile enough to manage rapidly emerging cyber-threats. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 5:41 am
This question has enormous implications for any investors, employees, and service providers of failed schemes who have arbitration agreements with the entities in receivership and are added as defendants by a receiver: if the supervising court allows the receiver to stand in place of creditors, with whom the defendants have no arbitration agreement, then the defendants will not be able to arbitrate their claims and will instead be subject to summary proceedings as a group — an outcome… [read post]
