Search for: "T Corley"
Results 1 - 20
of 122
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Sep 2023, 10:30 pm
As I noted further above, I predicted that the shifting-sands case wouldn't make it to trial. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 2:12 pm
The FTC had also asked Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley of the U.S. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 9:53 am
But as Judge Corley wrote, the size of the deal warranted scrutiny, and that's why I don't blame regulators for launching a Phase II investigation. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 1:22 pm
AT&T, 310 F. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 5:26 am
The FTC is facing down District Court Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley's finding that the regulator "has not shown a likelihood it will prevail on its claim this particular vertical merger in this specific industry may substantially lessen competition. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 10:41 am
The fact that "cloud" is a buzzword doesn't count. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 12:20 pm
"Just minutes before that key intervention by Judge Corley, I wrote on Twitter that her questions didn't bode well for the FTC. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 6:25 am
" But the defendants say the FTC can't get there on the basis of "scant proof. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 1:24 am
I believe it won't be hard for Judge Corley to see that the CMA decision is unlikely to stand. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 10:43 pm
I assume the case will be deemed as related to the private class-action-style lawsuit in San Francisco and assigned to United States District Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley. [read post]
22 May 2023, 1:05 am
Judge Corley handed down her decision late on Friday, the last business day before the earliest possible closing date. [read post]
15 May 2023, 2:51 pm
But individual warrant restrictions don't determine reasonableness; Fourth Amendment law does. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 5:39 am
United States (private lawsuit): At this point, closing is not imminent, so Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California doesn't have to resolve the motion for a preliminary injunction in the near term. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 12:28 am
The merits don't seem to matter. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 11:56 pm
But Judge Corley didn't like that notion, given that the usual purpose of judgment on the pleadings is to obviate the need for discovery--and here, discovery closed years ago ("the record is full"). [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 8:46 am
FTC can say at the moment, regrettably.Last month I commented very favorably on the JFTC's work to rein in digital #gatekeepers: https://t.co/YkOxamvWnx— Florian Mueller (@FOSSpatents) March 28, 2023 The fact that United States District Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley granted Microsoft's motion to dismiss a so-called gamers' (actually lawyers') lawsuit is also interesting, though the class-action law firms behind that case won't give up until they… [read post]
25 Mar 2023, 12:54 am
I don't think so. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 12:53 pm
Yesterday, a California judge, Jacqueline Corley, granted Microsoft’s motion to dismiss the suit, saying that the gamers didn’t “plausibly allege” that the merger “creates a reasonable probability of anticompetitive effects in any relevant market. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 12:12 am
Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley granted Microsoft's motion to dismiss because "[t]he Complaint does not plausibly allege the merger creates a reasonable probability of anticompetitive effects in any relevant market. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 11:48 pm
T-Mobile US, Inc., 2020 WL 1233939, at *1 (N.D. [read post]
