Search for: "T Edwards, LLC" Results 1 - 20 of 584
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2024, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
State business filings show Efficient Private Protection and Security LLC is owned by Brenda Grisham, who also serves as one of two principal officers for the recall campaign, Save Alameda For Everybody. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:46 pm by admin
Feb. 24, 2010) (quoting from Rule 26 report of Martin T. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 8:33 am by Kang Haggerty LLC
“It is an honor to have Judge Herron join our firm,” said managing member Edward T. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 7:00 pm by Howard Gutman
Expert Testimony Edward Clayton, (Clayton), testified on behalf of Pascarella, as an expert auto mechanic. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 11:31 am by The White Law Group
  Edward Jones Broker Charged with Defrauding 3 Customers  November 24, 2021 – Ronald T. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 11:04 am by Edward T. Kang
In the January 2, 2024 edition of The Legal Intelligencer, Edward Kang wrote, “An Antitrust Storm Brewing in the Walled Gardens: Dissecting the Antitrust Claims in ‘Epic v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 10:35 am by Kang Haggerty LLC
“Since joining us in 2020, Kyle has made significant contributions to the success and growth of our law firm,” said Edward T. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 8:41 am by Dennis Crouch
  The petitioners – including Intel, Edwards Lifesciences Corp., and Edwards Lifesciences LLC – brought suit alleging that the Fintiv rule exceeds the PTO’s statutory authority under the America Invents Act (AIA) and is arbitrary and capricious under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
” In other words, the investment into Fairfield resulted in payments to BLMIS in the US.17 But the District Court perceived a more limited relevant act and decreed that “[t]he definition of the relevant act’ is dispositive here. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 2:03 pm by Edward T. Kang
In the November 2, 2023 edition of The Legal Intelligencer, Edward Kang wrote, “Use Rule 106 to Your Advantage: Introducing the Rest of the Story in Real Time” Consider this scenario: Your client is under cross-examination. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 11:26 am by centerforartlaw
Lawyers may receive non-monetary compensation for their services, such as an ownership stake in a business venture, provided that this arrangement doesn’t involve acquiring a proprietary interest in the legal case or subject matter of the litigation.[7] However, despite the obvious benefits, accepting artwork for payment can get into the weeds of legal ethics, raising complex issues related to valuation, potential conflicts of interest, and disclosure requirements. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 1:06 pm by Edward T. Kang
In the October 12, 2023 Edition of The Legal Intelligencer, Edward Kang wrote “Jurisdiction Matters: Things to Consider Before Consulting With Clients During Depositions“. [read post]