Search for: "T-Fal Corp." Results 1 - 20 of 42
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2022, 8:06 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Kimberly-Clark Corp., No. 2:21-cv-01519-DAD-KJN, 2022 WL 16804522 (E.D. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 10:22 am by Rebecca Tushnet
California UCL, CLRA, FAL: First, defendants argued that under Sonner v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 10:18 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Pantron I Corp., 33 F.3d 1088 (9th Cir. 1994), rejecting the placebo effect as a way a product could “work. [read post]
8 May 2019, 7:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
For example, Lannett sold C-Topical to McKesson Corp., a wholesaler whose website indicated that C-Topical is generic and does not state that it is unapproved by the FDA. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 9:06 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Monster Beverage Corp., --- F.Supp.3d ----, 2018 WL 1662131, No. 12–2188–VAP (KKx) (C.D. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 8:21 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Pure omissions, when the defendant didn’t make any statement at all about a subject, aren’t covered by the FAL, so those claims also failed. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 12:27 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  But the court expressed willingness to revisit the issue later.Also, TRC’s UCL and FAL claims didn’t attempt to apply California law extraterritorially. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 5:58 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Ticketmaster Corp., 655 F.3d 1013 (9th Cir. 2011). [read post]