Search for: "T. J. T." Results 61 - 80 of 35,854
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
As a consequence, it is irrelevant that the evidence regarding the merger has been submitted after the appeal had been filed.The present case differs from the case underlying decision T 428/08 in several respects. [read post]
29 Nov 2019, 4:44 am by Chris Seaton
Smith didn’t actually send this letter to Ms. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 5:04 am by Immigration Prof
It Didn’t Have To Go Down Like This: On the Merciless Bureaucratic Cost/Benefit Balancing Behind Biden’s Failed Immigration Rollbacks By guest contributor: Joshua J. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 8:59 am
According to a Johnson & Johnson lawyer, J&J properly warned of the risks of its antibiotic Levaquin and shouldn’t be held liable for tendon injuries sustained by a 78-year-old man. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 12:25 am
” By 1996, J&J changed Levaquin’s warning label after being forced to by the FDA. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Thus, the Board came to the conclusion that the technical activity of step A did not interact with the mental activities of steps B to E to lead to a tangible technical result and therefore had to be ignored in the assessment of inventive step. [12] The Board considers that the present case clearly differs from the case underlying decision T 784/06. [read post]
19 May 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
T 19/87 [5]; T 668/89 [3]; T 417/00 [2.3] T 1829/10 [2.4]). [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 4:54 am by Jon Gelman
The accord will resolve more than 7,500 lawsuits in federaland state courts against J&J’s DePuy unit, said the people, whorequested anonymity because they weren’t authorized to speakpublicly about the settlement. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 11:30 pm by Nico Cordes
The decisions cited by the appellant in this respect (J 15/92 and J 17/04) do not concern decisions to grant a patent. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 3:19 am by Kevin Bercimuelle-Chamot
Thus, it concluded that the model “did not produce an overall impression different from the previous Redbubble model, producing an impression of déjà vu”. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 8:08 am by Cal Warriner
The Justice Department has been investigating J&J since 2004 for its marketing practices of Risperdal but that doesn’t seem to deter the practice. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 6:52 am by Cathy Moran
  J stands for Justify in my Bankruptcy Alphabet.? [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 8:31 am by Joy
#LegalTweetoftheDay: Fully vaccinated Canadians won't need COVID-19 test to cross U.S. land border via @CBCNews - Garry J. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
The present Board agrees with the opinion expressed in decision J 5/80 as summarised in the above headlines. [read post]