Search for: "T. J. T."
Results 121 - 140
of 36,208
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2009, 10:27 pm
I'm with James Fallows on this one: I was never drawn to J. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 5:19 am
Partner Nina T. [read post]
30 Jul 2023, 2:00 pm
So if you haven’t done so already, now is a good time to consider J-1 Waiver sponsorship. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 5:19 am
" It wasn't a whole lot of information, but it was enough for me. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 5:58 pm
And Carol J. [read post]
2 May 2018, 1:10 am
Urol. 159(5) Suppl., p. 327, abstract No. 1256D5 Extract from Lexikon Medizin 1997, p. 1180D7 Huard et al. 1998, J. [read post]
2 May 2018, 1:10 am
Urol. 159(5) Suppl., p. 327, abstract No. 1256D5 Extract from Lexikon Medizin 1997, p. 1180D7 Huard et al. 1998, J. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 3:01 pm
It is established Board of Appeal case law that further grounds which would lead to a refusal of a European patent application in the examination proceedings cannot be successfully presented in opposition proceedings (see for example G 1/91; J 22/86 [18]; T 99/85 [4]; T 127/85; T 301/87 [3.3-4]; T 550/88 [4]; T 428/95 [4.2]). [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 6:01 pm
A request that an appeal fee be debited together with an application number cannot be a substitute for an explicit and unequivocal statement expressing the definite intention to contest an appealable decision (see headnotes of T 460/95, J 16/94 and J 19/90). [read post]
10 Aug 2007, 1:13 pm
(Kids see a lot of boxes with the J&J “First Aid” logo.) [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 6:54 am
The Maine Supreme Judicial Court affirmed the dismissal of a civil action brought by a dissatisfied respondent attorney Seth T. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 6:32 am
" - Garry J. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 9:20 am
Meredith Stange (Northern Illinois), Burnout Doesn't Frighten Me, 25 L. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
In T 1981/12 the Board considered in detail the background of the rule. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 5:02 pm
As our Costa Mesa employment lawyer blog has discussed previously, the classification of "exempt" or "non-exempt" employees continues to be an important employment issue in businesses across the country--as employee misclassification can lead to federal and state wage and hour law violations affecting the employment rights of hardworking Americans. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 11:44 pm
That the board required a "clear and unambiguous declaration of intent that an appeal is filed" was arbitrary and did not find any basis in the relevant legal provisions.It followed from decision T 620/13, that the request under Rule 99(1)(c) EPC could be implicit.Furthermore, the present case was similar to the one underlying decision T 925/91.Decision J 19/90 was correct under the legal framework of the EPC 1973 but was no longer applicable since the entry into… [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 9:44 pm
" Edwin Meese III and J. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 3:02 pm
It has been decided that an Examining Division (ED) does not commit a substantial procedural violation when it fails to follow the Guidelines, unless it also violates a rule or principle of procedure governed by the EPC or one of the implementing regulations (T 42/84 [9]; T 647/93 [4.1]): the failure of a department of the EPO to follow a procedure set out in the Guidelines does not qualify as a substantial procedural violation as the Guidelines are not legally binding (J… [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm
Neither insufficient payment of the opposition fee, nor the Office’s obligations of notification are of any relevance in the case at issue. finally, decision J 13/91 also deals with the Office’s obligation of notification in cases of insufficient payment. [read post]
