Search for: "T. J. T."
Results 161 - 180
of 36,204
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2022, 3:00 am
Don't Abolish Employee Noncompete Agreements Alan J. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm
This decision was confirmed in subsequent decisions of the boards of appeal, for example T 445/98 [3] and T 371/92 [3.2, 3.4-5]. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 8:43 pm
John T. [read post]
19 May 2017, 7:10 am
Die jüngsten der Kammer bekannten Entscheidungen stammen aus den Jahren 2011 und 2012: T 239/08, T 2135/08, T 1600/09, T 207/10, T 648/10 und T 747/10. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 2:12 pm
Of course, anyone can donate even if you can't attend. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 5:30 pm
If it had had the intention to replace auxiliary request IV it would hardly have filed the request as additional auxiliary request VI. [6.5]The principle that the EPO is bound by the text submitted or agreed by the applicant is a procedural principle of so fundamental importance that each violation of the principle, even if it is due to an erroneous interpretation of a request, must be considered to be a substantial procedural violation (T 647/93 ; J 19/84). [6.7]To read the whole… [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 3:00 am
Ordover, J. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 3:01 pm
[2.1] It is established jurisprudence of the Boards of Appeal, see inter alia J 7/82, T 94/84 and T 135/96, that the right to be heard enshrined in A 113(1) also guarantees the right to have relevant grounds that could potentially influence the outcome taken into account in the written decision. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 7:38 am
FRANK J. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 10:00 pm
The documents mentioned in the present decision are the following:(1): McPherron, A.C. and Se-Jin Lee, J. [read post]
1 Dec 2012, 11:01 am
In its decision T 1289/10, the Board had to deal with a similar case of re-establishment of rights due to the loss of a time limit for reasons of e-mail communication. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 12:05 am
Stephanie J. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 9:55 pm
A noter encore que le site est déjà accessible dans de nombreuses langues dont le français. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm
In the present case the patent proprietor filed a request for re-establishment into the time limit for filing a notice of appeal.The factual situation was as follows (sorry for the length, but I find the modus operandi interesting):Mr Adrian F. had worked for 26 years in the law firm representing the appellant but had retired from the partnership on June 30, 2011. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 5:22 am
J 10/11, T 570/07).From the above it follows that the appeal is likely to be rejected as inadmissible. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 9:18 am
News; Our rankings provide students vital, accurate data; Administrators don’t like to be held accountable”: Eric J. [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 12:34 pm
More J. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 7:25 am
FRANK J. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 8:58 am
: Understanding Women's Civic and Political Choices FIRST EDITION J. [read post]
5 Oct 2019, 12:06 am
Forbes: Tax Court Can’t Order IRS To Not Jerk People Around, by Peter J. [read post]
