Search for: "T. QUILLEN"
Results 41 - 60
of 93
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2007, 10:37 am
Quillen, Jr. [read post]
18 Feb 2007, 3:29 am
Although Jaffe didn't give a reference for his assertion, one presumes he is relying on the studies of Quillen and Webster, the model for which allows a grant rate in excess of 100%. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 4:30 pm
"The trial judge in the girlfriend's case is retired Judge Quillen from the 30th Circuit. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 8:02 am
Sadly, systems which merely count citations don't make the distinction between a favorable citation and a critical one. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 10:20 am
Don't add an inspection step. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 6:00 am
This is a nonsensical situation, and one of the chief culprits is patents that issue that shouldn't issue. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 9:16 pm
The Quillen/Webster approach was accepted by Lemley, until he wrote "The Patent Office is Not a Rubber-Stamp," dumping Quillen/Webster sub silentio. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 7:37 am
***Of Wegner, note the previous IPBiz post Harold Wegner takes a walk on the dark side which discusses, among other things, Wegner's earlier trip on the Quillen/Webster bandwagon:One recalls that Wegner was involved in the Quillen/Webster business:If one looks at the second paper of Quillen and Webster (wherein the 97% grant figure is "qualified", 12 Fed. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 5:34 am
Mathesius wrote a scathing article about former Chief Justice Deborah Poritz, a political insider who never sat on a bench that wasn't in a park until Gov. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 7:09 am
Quillen, Jr., and Ogden H. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 1:33 pm
This also sort of reminds one of how some patent reformers cited to Quillen and Webster for a 97% patent grant rate, even though no such thing was in Quillen and Webster. [read post]
1 May 2024, 12:15 pm
But Little Tokyo’s history is rooted in a stubbornness that doesn’t allow us to give up. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 12:39 am
L.J. 727, 754 (2002).The interesting part is that Thomas says something about the 97% patent grant rate that Quillen and Webster didn't really say. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 5:30 am
Sounds like Quillen's patent grant rate analysis! [read post]
10 May 2008, 6:06 pm
Quillen and Webster's "97% patent grant rate" number was a scam all along. [read post]
25 May 2009, 10:36 pm
Of course, Quillen said Europe had higher quality patents than did the US. [read post]
11 Apr 2009, 2:17 am
Comment on Patently-O:You can't blame the economic downturn for the entire drop in filings. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 8:14 am
Quillen argues. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 10:49 pm
McKenzie should wipe the dust bunnies from his eyes.Jaffe/Lerner stuff isn't reality. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 6:01 pm
Kepplinger noted that "you can't make a mistake if you don't allow"); and5. [read post]
