Search for: "T. V. P."
Results 61 - 80
of 16,257
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2024, 7:25 am
P. alleged that Macquarie and various officer defendants had violated Section §10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b–5. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
The authors presented an adjusted OR of 15.58, with a p-value of 0.02. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Macey & Geoffrey P. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 7:13 am
But Redwater doesn’t go that far. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 10:32 am
Ela se oferece ao olhar de modo tão efêmero e transitório como uma constelaç& [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:12 am
CJEU, Easy Sanitary Solutions v Group Nivelles and EUIPO, cases C-361/15 P and C-405/15 P, para. 65). [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 8:48 am
P. 41(b). [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
From SSRN:Michael P. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 12:36 am
I didn’t do any sharp radical actions. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
However, the world isn’t this simple.[14] The complexity of social reality intrudes, even as a business may legitimately focus on its own economic strategies, plans, operations, investments, and marketing with profit-making in mind. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:19 am
Can't stop the signal. . . [read post]
6 Apr 2024, 12:32 pm
From Wednesday's opinion in H.S. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 9:10 pm
” (Id. at p. 1052.) [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 8:57 am
You can fight Uncle Sam, but it isn’t cheap. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ¹ You can find it at Housing Authority of Grapevine Charge ² See, Rodriguez v. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 8:05 am
Parker and Kelo v. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 2:12 pm
Los expertos legales en mordeduras de perro en Zneimer & Zneimer PC están comprometidos a asegurar que las víctimas reciban la compensación que merecen para cubrir los gastos médicos, pérdida de ingresos y otros daños resultantes de la lesión. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 11:15 am
Li v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 4:08 pm
When expert witnesses rely upon one or a few studies, which telegraph internal validity, this litigation strategy may provide the strongest evidence against the study’s being reasonably relied upon, or its providing “sufficient facts and data” to support an admissible expert witness opinion. [1] Daubert v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 3:02 pm
., wrote, "'[P]laintiff presented a case from which the jury could have found especially egregious conduct by clear and convincing evidence.' Pritchett, slip op. at 79 (emphasis added). [read post]
