Search for: "TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC" Results 61 - 80 of 157
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2011, 9:12 am by Wystan M. Ackerman
There has been a lot written about what impact the Supreme Court’s decision in AT&T Mobility, LLC v. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 3:18 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Cornerstone Telecommunications Infrastructure Ltd v Ashloch Ltd and another, on appeal from [2021] EWCA Civ 90. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 9:16 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Wednesday 23rd February, judgment will be handed down in Craig (AP) v Her Majesty’s Advocate (for the Government of the United States of America) and another, on appeal from [2020] HCJAC 22. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 8:19 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 14/2/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Basfar v Wong,… [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 3:52 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 07/2/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Basfar v Wong,… [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 10:53 am by Barry Sookman
Amazon. com, Inc., 834 F. 3d 220 (2nd.Cir.2016) Norcia v Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC 845 F.3d 1279 (9th.Cir.2017) McMillan v Chaker 2017 WL 1336941 (S.D.Cal. [read post]
2 Jun 2007, 2:16 pm
Serial No. 78438594 [Refusal to register the design mark shown below for an electronic nurse call system, on the ground that the mark is merely decorative or informational and fails to function as a trademark].June 26, 2007 - 10 AM: In re Sungard Reference Data Solutions Inc., Serial No. 78212906 [Section 2(d) refusal of REFERENCEPOINT for computer software for use by energy providers, and by commodities, futures, stock, and bond traders, in light of the registered mark REFERENCE POINT for providing… [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 9:36 pm
December 8, 2009 - 2 PM: Bridgestone Firestone North America Tire, LLC v. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 9:13 am by Beth Graham
  In Samsung Electronics America, Inc. f/k/a Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC, No. 363 NLRB No. 105 (February 3, 2016), a field sales manager for Samsung, Franks, signed a Mutual Agreement to Arbitrate Claims prior to beginning her employment. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:11 pm by Eric Schweibenz
According to the Order, Complainants Spansion, Inc. and Spansion LLC (collectively, “Spansion”) moved to compel Respondents Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung International, Inc., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”) to produce certain documents, witnesses, information, and samples relating to the manufacture and programming of… [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 8:01 am by Raquel Leslie, Brian Liu
The agency is also currently reviewing whether China-controlled Pacific Networks Corp. and its ComNet (USA) LLC unit pose similar risks to U.S. national security. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:57 am by Jim Singer
Top filers in 2015 and 2016 also included Bank of America, Cisco, and EMC. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 6:09 pm by Eric Schweibenz
(Shanghai Factory); Verbatim Americas LLC; and Verbatim Corporation (collectively, “Respondents”). [read post]
31 May 2012, 3:40 pm by Eric Schweibenz
(“SEA”), and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC’s (“STA”) (collectively, “Samsung”) motion to compel Complainant Apple Inc. [read post]