Search for: "THE DOE LEGAL ENTITY 1-10" Results 61 - 80 of 3,279
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2023, 3:34 pm
 Pix Credit: Marble Relief (2 Pair of Collared Slaves led by helmeted men perhaps to fight like the animals below; Izmir (Smyrna) c AD 200 (University of Oxford Collection Sometimes the most intriguing legal developments in the liberal democratic camp come from its most active flanks. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 11:08 am by Dan Harris
Are you doing business in China without a Chinese legal entity? [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 11:22 am by Marco Rossi
Furthermore, taxpayers can settle any audit out of court by paying a penalty equal to 1/3 of the minimum (that is to say, 1 percent of the value of unreported assets). [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 4:00 am by Malcolm Mercer
In Canada, self-regulation is generally[1] the approach. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 6:58 am by Matthew Ackerman
  The Takings Clause does not restrict government entities from taking private property where necessary for a public use. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 7:44 am by Marco Rossi
 Under the indirect ownership rule, a shareholding or ownership interest (of any size) in the “tested” corporate entity, owned by another legal entity (such as another corporate entity, trust, foundation, etc.), is attributed to the beneficial owner(s) of such other legal entity, to determine the ultimate beneficial owner of the “tested” corporate entity. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 7:44 am by Marco Rossi
 Under the indirect ownership rule, a shareholding or ownership interest (of any size) in the “tested” corporate entity, owned by another legal entity (such as another corporate entity, trust, foundation, etc.), is attributed to the beneficial owner(s) of such other legal entity, to determine the ultimate beneficial owner of the “tested” corporate entity. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 3:24 am by Peter Mahler
Question #1: Why didn’t the court enforce the forum selection clause? [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 3:24 am by Peter Mahler
Question #1: Why didn’t the court enforce the forum selection clause? [read post]
10 May 2019, 7:05 am by Unknown
 The Commission has proposed guidance to address the application of the certification and opinion of counsel requirement when such potential legal impediments and barriers are present. [read post]
”  While the list is by no means exhaustive, it does provide some hot topics for organizations to consider in 2017. 1. [read post]
”  While the list is by no means exhaustive, it does provide some hot topics for organizations to consider in 2017. 1. [read post]
24 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
”[9] Section 692.203 applies the same prohibition to real property within ten miles of any “military installation”[10]or “critical infrastructure facility” (such as airports, seaports, power plants, or refineries).[11] Section 692.204 goes further, specifically targeting China by prohibiting certain China-related persons from “directly or indirectly own[ing], hav[ing] a controlling interest in, or acquir[ing] by purchase, grant, devise or descent”… [read post]
5 Jul 2014, 8:47 am
”Trebro Mfg., Inc. at *10 (citation omitted).Claim 1Claim 1 is pertinent for this appeal: 1. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 2:40 pm by Unknown
In the case of legal entities or legal arrangements, reference should be made to the beneficial ownership definition stemming from Article 3(6) (a) (b) (c) of Directive 2015/849 which is set on internationally agreed standards. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 6:31 am by Michael A. Jacobs
This provision does not prevent property owners from conveying a less than controlling interest in New York real property free of transfer tax by first contributing the property to a legal entity, and then selling a less than 50% interest in the legal entity to the intended transferee. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver
Here is the latest decision by the Enlarged Board, on corrections under R 140.The underlying case was as follows:The opposition (filed on September 10, 2004) had been based on the sole ground of added subject-matter (A 100(c)), the only argument being that in claim 1 of the patent the feature “means for initiating (56) a command related to a position of the device data” was not disclosed in the application as filed. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 4:36 pm
However, just because a business can prove that someone violated a noncompete agreement does not mean that the business can prevent that person or entity from continuing to do so. [read post]