Search for: "THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA" Results 21 - 40 of 35,326
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2024, 7:38 am by Ellena Erskine
Here’s the Monday morning read: Louisiana urges Supreme Court to quickly resolve congressional map fight in emergency request (John Fritze, CNN) Supreme Court denies California’s plea for immunity for COVID-19 deaths at San Quentin (David G. [read post]
13 May 2024, 7:36 am by Eric Goldman
— If the Northern District of California’s recent rulings with Bright Data were a bit of a surprise, its recent decision in the X Corp. v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 7:02 am by Yosi Yahoudai
” More to Read The post Supreme Court denies California’s plea for immunity for COVID-19 deaths at San Quentin appeared first on J&Y Law Firm. [read post]
10 May 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
It is with horror and shame that we report to you that the Michigan Supreme Court, in a unanimous decision, has okayed warrantless drone surveillance for the purpose of civil code enforcement. [read post]
10 May 2024, 11:07 am by Robert Zulandt
The Supreme Court stated that the derivative work served the same commercial purpose as the original and the fair use factor – purpose and context – weighed against the Andy Warhol Foundation’s fair use defense. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:45 am by Evangelina Cantu
They rely on the equal sovereignty principle, which the Supreme Court applied in Shelby County v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:30 am by Terry Hart
Justices Leave Door Open to Discovery Rule Copyright Damages — Bloomberg Law’s Kyle Jahner writes about yesterday’s Supreme Court decision in Warner Chappell Music v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 3:27 am by SHG
That decision was reversed by the court of appeals, and the Supreme Court of Wisconsin affirmed the appellate decision. [read post]
10 May 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Court Temporarily Suspends Trump Lawyer John Eastman’s Law License MSN – Maegan Vazquez (Washington Post) | Published: 5/4/2024 The District of Columbia Court of Appeals suspended John Eastman’s law license after a similar decision in California, which did so over his role in a legal strategy to help Donald Trump stay in power after his 2020 election loss. [read post]
9 May 2024, 10:01 pm by rhapsodyinbooks
The case made its way to the US Supreme Court after losing in the Supreme Court of California and the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of California. [read post]
9 May 2024, 10:48 am
Supreme Court and for Judge Jeffrey Sutton of the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:15 am by Lawrence Solum
Dov Fox (University of San Diego: School of Law) & Mary Ziegler (University of California, Davis - School of Law) have posted The Lost History of 'History and Tradition' (Southern California Law Review, Vol. 98, No. 1 (2024), Forthcoming) on SSRN. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Supreme Court has imposed a three-part test to determine whether a work is obscene:the average person ... would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest;the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by the applicable state law; andthe work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.[5]The purpose of the third requirement is, as the Court explained… [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Supreme Court has imposed a three-part test to determine whether a work is obscene:the average person ... would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest;the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by the applicable state law; andthe work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.[5]The purpose of the third requirement is, as the Court explained… [read post]
8 May 2024, 2:24 pm by Guest Author
As the Supreme Court ponders what to do with Chevron in Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 2:00 pm
Plaintiffs would lose even in the current Supreme Court; fairly clearly, in my opinion.The only thing that surprised me, though, was who was suing.The plaintiffs themselves are John Does. [read post]