In AFFIRMING the judgment appealed from, the Second Circuit rejected Lumbermens' argument that the District Court judge misapplied the “common speech” and “reasonable expectations” doctrines in construing the pollution exclusion against Lumbermens: As an initial matter, the complaint in the underlying action does not allege that the plaintiff, Theodore Bohn, was damaged by a “pollutant” or that the odors emitted from BG’s [Barney… [read post]