Search for: "THOMAS CLAYTON" Results 61 - 80 of 284
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
Clayton County, and as I explained here and here.You also select Justices who will continue to scale back the Establishment Clause, if your goal is to empower the religious at the expense of the public. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:00 am by Comunicaciones_MJ
Con el proceso de Bork recién vivido, muchos le auguraban al nominado Thomas la misma suerte. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 3:44 pm by David Kopel
The present Chief Judge, Sidney Thomas (Clinton, 1996), has been active in effectuating en banc reversals. [read post]
5 Sep 2020, 4:21 am by Hon. Richard G. Kopf
(Emphasis by Kopf) But the three dissenters (Thomas, Alito and Kavanaugh) thought quite differently and relied upon textualist grounds as well. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 6:10 am
Securities and Exchange Commission, on Thursday, July 23, 2020 Tags: Capital markets, Investor protection, Retirement plans, SEC, Securities enforcement, Securities regulation Statement by Chairman Clayton at Open Meeting to Adopt Amendments to the Proxy Solicitation Rules Posted by Jay Clayton, U.S. [read post]
3 Jul 2020, 6:09 am
House Committee on Financial Services Posted by Jay Clayton, U.S. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 9:00 pm by Rodger Citron
Clayton County, the Court’s recent decision holding that the federal law prohibiting employment discrimination applies to gay, lesbian, and transgender employees. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 3:47 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Economist, Steven Mazie looks at the “defiant jurisprudence” of Justice Clarence Thomas, who is completing his 29th year on the Supreme Court bench this term. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 11:43 am by Thomas Baer
The lead dissent was written by Justice Alito and joined by Justice Thomas. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 3:56 am by Edith Roberts
At Courthouse News Service (via How Appealing), Megan Miniero reports that “Justice Clarence Thomas called out his colleagues Monday for turning down a case where threat convictions were overturned because they lacked an intent to intimidate. [read post]