Search for: "TIME WARNER CABLE LLC"
Results 1 - 20
of 64
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2024, 12:46 pm
If you listened closely, you could hear a roar of disapproval from the Albany Rural Cemetery.[7] For some time, the MDL 1535 judge winked at the plaintiffs’ and Harrison’s improper ploy to demonize lawful, appropriate industry conduct, and the MDL resolved before the parties obtained a ruling on Harrison’s proffered testimony. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 6:48 am
For example, if your lawyer wants to know the cost of your monthly cable bill, here is a “costly” response: “Well, we used to have Time Warner, but to add Showtime and HBO was an extra $65.00 a month. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 11:48 pm
Time Warner Cable, Inc., 2007 WL 1892227, at *7 (D. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 1:16 pm
Time Warner Cable, Inc., 846 F. 3d 909, 912 (CA7 2017). [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 1:48 pm
By allowing no inquiry into any conduct preceding the demonstration except to identify “actual participants,” the Board disallowed highly relevant inquiry into identification of those deserving of discipline (Time Warner Cable of New York City LLC v. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 10:22 am
Time Warner Cable Inc. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 8:57 am
Time Warner Cable, Inc., 894 F. 3d 473, 479 (2d Cir. 2018). [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 9:44 am
Barry, No. 19-414 (when is a process-invention “ready for patenting” so that a public use or offer to sell would create a bar to patentability) Time Warner Cable, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
Asarco LLC, 135 S. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
2018 was another busy busy year in the world of copyright, and a continuing global 'theme' was the ongoing battle between 'big tech' and 'big content', with the likes of Google and YouTube continuing to lobby extensively against planned reforms, bringing onboard (some) of the creative community - whilst the 'big content' (including film companies, music companies, the games sector and television) rolled out other creators - and finally seemed to be… [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 12:40 pm
Time Warner Cable Inc., the Second Circuit determined that qualification as an ATDS was limited to those devices that were “capable at the time of use” of performing the functions of an autodialer, absent any modifications to the device’s hardware or software. 849 F.3d 473, 476–77 (2d Cir. 2018). [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 7:00 am
Time Warner Cable, Inc., which involved “an injury functionally indistinguishable from” those supporting the applicant’s notice claim. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 6:02 am
In particular, a Charter stockholder challenged a voting proxy agreement between Charter and Liberty and two stock issuances worth $5 billion made by Charter to Liberty, allegedly as a part of the “financing” of Charter’s $78.7 billion merger with Time Warner Cable and its purchase of Bright House Networks, LLC. [read post]
19 May 2018, 12:44 pm
Time Warner Cable Texas, LLC, 2017 WL 5985573, at *5 (W.D. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 11:56 am
Time Warner Cable, 714 F.3d 739 (2d Cir. 2013). [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 2:36 pm
Did you receive a notice from Charter Communications/ Time Warner Cable or Optimum Online about a subpoena to reveal your name received from Strike 3 Holdings LLC? [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 1:51 pm
On October 19th, New York District Judge Edgardo Ramos approved Badhouse Studios’ request to subpoena Time Warner Cable, Verizon Fios, and Optimum Online to reveal the […] The post Badhouse Studios LLC to Learn Names of Those Who Downloaded “Larceny” Film For Free – ISP Subpoena Defense appeared first on Torrent Defenders. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 10:38 am
On September 18, 2017 Badhouse Studios, LLC filed 13 federal copyright infringement lawsuits against internet users of Spectrum (Time-Warner Cable), Verizon Fios, and Optimum Online in the District of New York federal court, Southern District. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 3:32 pm
Time Warner Cable, Inc., 865 F.3d 884, 887 (7th Cir. 2017) (internal quotation marks omitted) (citing Meyers v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 8:40 am
POW Nevada LLC Sues Hawaiian Users for “Revolt” Copyright Infringement Hawaiian internet users of Hawaiian Telcom, Time Warner Cable, Verizon Wireless, and Sprint PCS are being sued for illegal downloads of the 2017 science fiction film “Revolt”. [read post]
