Search for: "TM Claims Service, Inc." Results 161 - 180 of 268
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2012, 8:36 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Seacrets, Inc., 2012 WL 1282382 (D. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 7:25 am by Rebecca Tushnet
(This is another example of TM owners being favored over competitors in the TM/false advertising divide: compare the materiality standard used in, say, Pizza Hut with the statement the court quoted that, “because many factors influence a consumer's decision to purchase a product, the materiality standard must be kept low to include even subtle differences between products,” Beltronics USA, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 1:45 am
| Pro-Football Inc v Amanda Blackhorse et al. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 6:35 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Hollywood Unlocked, Inc., No.: 2:21-cv-07929-MEMF(PVCx), 2022 WL 18674459 (C.D. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 12:04 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Unfortunately, claims of incontestability are not subject to substantive examination at the PTO. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 1:31 am
It concerns liability and renewal practice management for European patent attorneys and addresses the onerous responsibilities that previous Boards have held applicable to EP attorneys in cases where an applicant uses a third party service to pay renewal fees, and defines an exception to those onerous responsibilities.* Serving a patent infringement claim out of the jurisdiction? [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 11:58 am by Lara
Waldo Sued for TM Infringement (Again!) [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 3:11 am
BTW: The TTABlogger claims trademark rights in the term "trifusal" for blogging services in the field of trademarks.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 6:01 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Joint Equity Committee of Investors of Real Estate Partners, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 4:18 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Jewel Food Stores, Inc., No. 1:10-cv-00340 (N.D. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 3:09 am by Dennis Crouch
Fossil, Inc., et al, No. 16-202 (SCA Redux plus TM issue) Eligibility: TDE Petroleum Data Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]