Search for: "Tams Corp" Results 61 - 80 of 468
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The Texas Supreme Court recently provided pointed guidance to litigants seeking attorney’s fees in a fee-shifting setting. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 9:22 am by Ben Kostyack
Kohn, a partner at the qui tam law firm of Kohn, Kohn and Colapinto. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 1:26 pm by Fraud Fighters
Southern California medical equipment manufacturer ResMed Corp. recently settled its whistleblower case with the Department of Justice (DOJ) for $37 million. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 5:26 pm by Ben Vernia
  These whistleblower, or qui tam, actions comprise a significant percentage of the False Claims Act cases that are filed. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 7:09 am by Tinker Ready
From the report: Of the $3 billion in settlements and judgments reported by the government in fiscal year 2019, over $2.1 billion arose from lawsuits filed under the qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 7:09 am by Tinker Ready
From the report: Of the $3 billion in settlements and judgments reported by the government in fiscal year 2019, over $2.1 billion arose from lawsuits filed under the qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:21 pm by Robert Liles
Attorneys are required to share the information they obtain in response to Civil Investigative Demands and / or qui tam investigation with their criminal colleagues. [read post]
17 Aug 2019, 8:00 am by Paul Caron
A federal judge in Florida on Monday dismissed a qui tam suit brought by two former employees of... [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 5:46 pm by Ben Vernia
On July 2, the Department of Justice announced that Encompass Health Corp. has agreed to pay $48 million to settle allegations brought in three qui tam suits Encompass Health Corporation (formerly known as HealthSouth Corporation), the nation’s largest operator of inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs), has agreed to pay $48 million to resolve allegations that some of its IRFs provided inaccurate information to Medicare to maintain their status as an IRF and to earn a… [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 4:30 am by David Oscar Markus
Tam, which struck down the registration bar for the other type of offensive trademarks — those deemed disparaging. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 5:11 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
 Further, S M Tam Architect has shown that it was not in privily with plaintiffs, nor did it have a relationship with plaintiffs that was the functional equivalent of privily, from which a professional malpractice claim could arise (see Sutton Apartments Corp. v Bradhurst 100 Dev. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 7:12 am by Megan Carpenter
Tam, which struck down the registration bar for the other type of offensive trademarks — those deemed disparaging. [read post]