Search for: "Target.com"
Results 81 - 88
of 88
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2007, 9:11 pm
What is the obligation of a retailer to make its web page available to the visually handicapp? [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 1:52 pm
The plaintiff claims that the Target.com website fails to use such embedded data despite it being technologically simple and not economically prohibitive. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 1:36 am
An initial glance through the 33 pages of the ruling suggests that the Court relied upon the plaintiff's evidence of his inability to use the Target.com, in practical terms. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 2:45 pm
Sept. 28, 2007) Judge Patel has certified two classes in the lawsuit over Target.com's compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 8:49 am
Plaintiffs, led by the National Federation for the Blind, are making their case under the ADA as well as two California state laws, claiming they “are being denied equal access to Target stores” because of poor access to Target.com. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 11:01 pm
Second, the court held that Web sites such as target.com are required by California law to be accessible. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 3:08 am
The qualifying web competitors (”Web Competitors”) are: Staples.com, OfficeMax.com, BestBuy.com, CircuitCity.com, Reliable.com, Quill.com, Sears.com, Target.com, KMart.com, Costco.com, SamsClub.com, CDW.com, Tigerdirect.com, Outpost.com and Frys.com. [read post]
5 Oct 2006, 12:10 pm
Plaintiffs, national and state advocacy groups for the blind, claimed that defendant's website (Target.com) is inaccessible to the blind, and therefore violates the ADA and similar California state laws. [read post]
