Search for: "Taylor v. Commandant"
Results 61 - 80
of 147
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2017, 1:22 pm
Pino v. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 7:00 am
The Appellate Division affirmed the lower court’s ruling.The Appellate Division said that Plaintiffs had noted “the obstacle” to their cause of action in view of the Court of Appeals’ decision in Martin v Curran, 303 NY 276,* but contended the so-called Martin rule was abrogated by the enactment of the Taylor Law in 1967** or by its 1990 amendment codifying the so-called Triboro Doctrine.In Palladino v CNY Centro, Inc., 23 NY3d 140, explained the… [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 12:24 pm
Humphrey in 1994 and Wallace v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 4:05 am
The complaint (full text) in Doe v. [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 9:54 am
In People v Taylor, the officer essentially placed the PBT device in front of defendant’s mouth without asking the defendant to take the test or giving the defendant enough time to refuse. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 11:31 am
’” Retired General John Allen, former Commander of the United States Forces in Afghanistan, gave a speech that in years past might have been more likely to have been delivered at a Republican National Convention, with its strong support for American military power. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 5:00 am
This might provide an additional justification for the anti-commandeering principle recognized in Printz or the Court’s construction of the spending power in NFIB v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 2:29 pm
Rushforth then turns to Judge Waits’ relationship with Fred Taylor, who was previously part of the United States v. [read post]
15 May 2016, 5:49 am
Bonenberger v. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 2:42 pm
Bunn v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 5:59 am
Taylor, 117 N.C. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 5:59 am
Taylor, 117 N.C. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 4:08 pm
John Taylor v. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 11:18 am
(Taylor Jones/Ft. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 10:50 am
Justice Scalia himself wrote, in Mistretta, that: a certain degree of discretion, and thus of lawmaking, inheres in most . . . judicial action, and it is up to Congress, by the relative specificity or generality of its statutory commands, to determine—up to a point—how small or how large that degree shall be. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 8:11 am
Gee, and the ABC and CBS cases proceeding in New York before the Honorable Laura Taylor Swain. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
http://t.co/O88Biap1fB -> Venue Clause in YouTube Terms of Service Upheld–Song Fi v. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 8:53 am
This is not a case where the state judges were confused about the law or overlooked key evidence, as in Taylor v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 11:03 am
This is not a case where the state judges were confused about the law or overlooked key evidence, as in Taylor v. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 10:43 pm
” Prosecutor v. [read post]
