Search for: "Taylor v. Hughes"
Results 1 - 20
of 119
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2016, 8:08 am
In R v Taylor [2016] UKSC 5, the Supreme Court allowed the appeal of Mr Taylor against the decision of the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) allowing the appeal of the Crown Prosecution Service against a terminatory ruling of the Crown Court that effectively directed Mr Taylor’s acquittal. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 3:28 am
I have sometimes written my opposition to unpublished opinions.The Supreme Court's decision earlier this month in Hughes v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 3:00 am
Sumption concluded that the test is as set out in R v Hughes: there must be “at least some act or omission in the control of the car which involves some element of fault, whether amounting to careless/inconsiderate driving or not, and which contributes in some more than minimal way to the death”. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
See, for example, Arland v Taylor, [1955] OR 131 (CA); R v Cinous, [2002] 2 SCR 3; and R v Lavallee, [1990] 1 SCR 852. 13. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 6:30 am
The book also explores several common themes which are fundamental to the development of the law of contract: for instance, the influence of commercial expectations, appeals to 'reason' and the significance of particular judicial ideologies and techniques.TOC after the jump.1 Coggs v Barnard (1703) DAVID IBBETSON2 Pillans v Van Mierop (1765) GERARD MCMEEL3 Carter v Boehm (1766) STEPHEN WATTERSON4 Da Costa v Jones (1778) WARREN SWAIN5 Hochster v… [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 4:44 pm
The defendants (David Evans and Harry Taylor), were supporters of the Labour Part who published an advert alluding to a “Dodgy Deal” between the claimant and another Conservative politician (Eddie Hughes, MP for Walsall North). [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 4:08 pm
During that conversation Mr Cooper told spoke privately to Mr Taylor. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 4:31 am
Maintaining its recent record of coming out ahead of its cover date, the July 2007 issue of Sweet & Maxwell's monthly IP flagship journal, the European Intellectual Property Review, still edited by its originator Hugh Brett, has some highly timely and topical content. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 5:13 am
It was irrelevant that the contested trade mark may have been developed based on the word ‘hyundai’ because the public would still have to engage in a highly imaginative cognitive process in order to decipher the sign.PatentsRose Hughes reported on the first substantive decision of the UPC Court of Appeal, which reversed the preliminary injunction in 10x Genomics v NanoString. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 4:57 pm
Whilst Goodman and Mulcaire both pleaded guilty in respect of conspiracy to intercept voicemail messages of the three members of the Royal Household, namely Helen Asprey, Paddy Harveson and Jamie Lowther-Pinkerton, Glenn Mulcaire also pleaded guilty to separate counts of interception of voicemail communications of five other victims; Max Clifford, Gordon Taylor, Simon Hughes, Elle MacPherson and Mr Andrew. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 3:00 am
Taylor Reveley7. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 10:32 am
Loving v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 1:00 am
In R v Waltham London Borough Council, ex parte Vale, The Times, 28 February 1985, Taylor J held that the ordinary residence of such a person was the ordinary residence of their parents or guardians. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 8:51 am
Pt. 10 1/24/22 19-1401 Hughes v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 8:51 am
Pt. 10 1/24/22 19-1401 Hughes v. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 2:35 am
– Brian Cathcart Defamation Act 2013: The public interest defence and digital communications – Jacob Rowbottom Case Law: Dawson-Damer v Taylor Wessing, Subject access requests: Court of Appeal bolsters right to disclosure of data – Ashley Hurst and Peter Barratt Seamus Milne and the ‘Mystery Blonde’: Five years after Leveson the press still ignores privacy – Hugh Tomlinson QC How Dacre and the Mail are making the case for section 40… [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 1:00 am
Commissioners for HMRC v Taylor Clark Leisure Plc (Scotland), heard 11 Apr 2018. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 4:03 pm
The top ten posts of the past 12 months were as follows: Case Preview: Jack Monroe v Katie Hopkins, Twitter libel trial about meaning and serious harm How to avoid defamation – Steven Price Defamation Act 2013: A Summary and Overview – Iain Wilson and Max Campbell Case Report: Jack Monroe v Katie Hopkins, Libel Trial, Day 3: Claimants closing submissions, judgment reserved Is there is any difference between the public interest and the interest of the public… [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 5:40 am
R v Reeves Taylor, heard 24-25 Jun 2019. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 10:32 am
Strieff — need to suppress evidence seized under an outstanding warrant discovered during an investigatory stop later found to be illegal Tuesday, February 23: Taylor v. [read post]
