Search for: "Technology Innovations Associates LLC v. Google Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 65
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2023, 6:00 am by Michelle
“It’s critical to get these bills across the line,” said Warren, referring to a pair of House bills, the Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century Act and the Clarity for Payment Stablecoins Act of 2023, which both moved out of their respective committees this summer. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:25 am by INFORRM
However, Google and DeepMind argue that the case should be dismissed following the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling in Lloyd v Google LLC [2021] UKSC 50, in which it was held that uniform damages could not be obtained for each member of the class [148]. [read post]
  The Executive Order highlighted several particular sectors of concern (namely agriculture, information technology, healthcare and prescription drugs, telecommunications, and labor, including a focus on non-compete provisions that impact workers), but the call for stronger antitrust enforcement was economy-wide. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 8:43 am by Kristian Soltes
The letter, signed the by Secure Cash Transport Association, Independent Armored Car Operators Association, ATM Industry Association, and Chicago-based money-security services provider Davis Bancorp, asked Congressional and state leaders to support legislation that protects payment choice, including cash. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 7:35 am by Kristian Soltes
’s V 2.65% $5.3 billion deal to acquire Plaid Inc., a key player in the financial-technology space. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 8:05 am by Bob Ambrogi
Outside funding: Less than $1M in outside funding DocStyle LLC Founded: 10/12/2018. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 5:31 am by Barry Sookman
. _________________________ I am a Senior Partner in the technology law group of McCarthy Tétrault. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
Google’s response was simply to close down Google News in Spain. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
District Judge Colleen McMahon rejected Sirius’ arguments that Flo & Eddie Inc, controlled by founding band members Howard Kaylan and Mark Volman, did not own copyrights in The Turtles’ recordings or that Sirius had an “implied” license to play Turtles' songs. [read post]