Search for: "Tellabs, Inc."
Results 61 - 80
of 151
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2009, 1:26 pm
(Editor’s Note: This post is based on a client memorandum by Jonathan C. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 10:28 am
The viability of the Ninth Circuit’s particularity requirement has been the subject of much debate since the Supreme Court’s decision in Tellabs, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2009, 4:59 pm
The Supreme Court, in Tellabs, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 9:00 am
We are discussing Judge Bybee's decision in Zukko, a decision that was deliberately designed to resurrect the largely discredited standard for scienter set out in the 9th Circuit decision In re Silicon Graphics Inc. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 5:15 am
We have been following the lower court implementation of Tellabs, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 4:05 am
Inspire Pharmaceuticals Inc., 549 F.3d 618 (4th Cir. 2008) [Slip Opn., at 2]. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 5:11 am
Inspire Pharmaceuticals Inc. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 10:55 pm
Because this formulation of the applicable pleading standard is contrary to the Supreme Court's decision in Tellabs, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 5:56 pm
Glazer also is notable for its reaffirmation of Ninth Circuit authority predating the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Tellabs, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 5:56 pm
Glazer also is notable for its reaffirmation of Ninth Circuit authority predating the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Tellabs, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 1:15 pm
Killinger, 542 F.3d 776 (9th Cir. 2008) Washington Mutual, Inc. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 6:47 pm
The district court erred by failing to see, the court held, that Tellabs, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 1:15 pm
Portfolio Equities, Inc, 540 F.3d 333 (5th Cir. 2008)("This case presents similar special circumstances that, when considered together, lend themselves to a sufficient inference of scienter. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 7:00 pm
Biogen IDEC Inc., 537 F.3d 35 (1st Cir. 2008). [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 3:14 pm
However, recent circuit court cases issued in light of the Supreme Court's Tellabs, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 12:06 pm
Relying on the Supreme Court’s opinion in Tellabs, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 4:09 am
Home Depot, Inc., 2008 WL 4498940 (11th Cir. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 11:25 am
Supreme Court opinion in Tellabs, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 4:00 pm
Ferris, Baker Watts, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 2:54 pm
As to scienter, the Second Amended Complaint alleged that the Individual Defendants were motivated to commit fraud by their desire to meet the aggressive revenue targets set by Amex and that certain Individual Defendants were motivated by their incentive compensation.Relying in large part on Tellabs, Inc. v. [read post]
