Search for: "Terry Kerr"
Results 61 - 80
of 80
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2015, 12:01 pm
The en banc Eleventh Circuit has ruled that historical cell-site records are not protected by the Fourth Amendment under the third-party doctrine. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 10:22 am
I then conducted a Terry Pat Down on Mr. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 6:00 am
Guadalupe: Yes Hale: No Hall: No Hamilton: No Hansford: No Hardeman: No Hardin: No Harris: No Harrison: No Hartley: No Haskell: No Hays: Yes Henderson: No Hidalgo: No Hill: No Hockley: No Hood: Yes Hopkins: Yes Houston: No Howard: No Hudspeth: No Hunt: No Hutchinson: Yes Irion: Yes Jack: Yes Jackson: No Jasper: Yes Jeff Davis: No Jefferson: No Jim… [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 4:10 am
At SCOTUSBlog, Orin Kerr explained the view for those who don’t prefer to wear rose-colored glasses. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 8:53 am
At Balkinization, Mark Tushnet reports on a pre-decision rumor “sourced to a clerk” that the Court had voted to strike down the act, and at the Volokh Conspiracy Orin Kerr reports on an apparent pre-decision leak to Ramesh Ponnuru of the National Review. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 5:57 am
I’m looking forward to getting my copy of the Brooking Institute’s volume on Constitution 3.0 co-edited by Jeff Rosen (who had a fabulous interview with NPR’s Terry Gross on the book): Orin Kerr has an interesting chapter on the promise of disclosure restrictions. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 9:16 am
This, of course, is one of those ridiculous legal fictions that only a court could indulge.Orin Kerr notes the decision by 10th Circuit Judge Michael McConnell in United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 5:02 am
Was something akin to the Terry-stop reasonable suspicion standard sufficient for law enforcement to compel the data it wanted through a 2703(d) order, or did the ECPA require a higher probable cause standard and thus a warrant? [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:07 am
(I also, incidentally, follow Kerr in his conclusions: The statutory claims are mostly spurious; the Fourth Amendment claim is legitimate.) [read post]
5 May 2010, 5:59 pm
Hood 100.Hopkins 101.Houston 102.Howard 103.Hunt 104.Hutchinson 105.Irion 106.Jack 107.Jackson 108.Jasper 109.Jeff Davis 110.Jefferson 111.Jim Hogg 112.Jim Wells 113.Johnson 114.Jones 115.Kaufman 116.Karnes 117.Kendall 118.Kenedy 119.Kent 120.Kerr 121.Kimble 122.King 123.Kinney 124.Kleberg 125.Lamar 126.Lamb 127.Lampasas 128.La Salle 129.Lavaca 130.Lee 131.Leon 132.Liberty 133.Limestone 134.Lipscomb 135.Live Oak 136.Llano 137.Loving 138.Lubbock 139.Lynn 140.Madison 141.Marion… [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 12:30 pm
Institute for Justice (2011): Your summarist is asked by his boss for an opinion on the then-recently-filed case Kerr v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 1:15 pm
Institute of Peace Former Deputy Prosecutor of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia & Special Advisor to the UN Assistance to the Khmer Rouge Trials "Making Complementarity Work: Lessons from Yugoslavia and Cambodia" Respondent & Discussion Facilitator Professor Fernando Teson, Tobias Simon Eminent Scholar, FSU Law School 12:30… [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 11:56 am
Be sure to read Stewart Baker’s post at Volokh Conspiracy in response to DNI Clapper’s statement, as well as Orin Kerr’s post at the same blog focusing on the legal standard Clapper invoked in his statement—the Terry v. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 5:00 am
Terry Health Law Prof Blog Indiana, Bloomington M William D. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 11:28 am
In honor of International Women's Day, a list of some films that feature female lawyers and judges.A la folie, pas du tout (2002). [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 11:28 am
In honor of International Women's Day, a list of some films that feature female lawyers and judges.A la folie, pas du tout (2002). [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 4:44 am
Below the fold is Version 3.0 of the census of law prof Twitter users. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 7:53 am
I want to return to Jones for what will probably be my final thoughts on the case for a while. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
ITERATIVE DISJUNCTIVE SYLLOGISM Basic propositional logic teaches that the disjunctive syllogism (modus tollendo ponens) is a valid argument, in which one of its premises is a disjunction (P v Q), and the other premise is the negation of one of the disjuncts: P v Q ~P_____ ∴ Q See Irving Copi & Carl Cohen Introduction to Logic at 362 (2005). [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 8:55 am
Text messaging is a great way to communicate, but beware that when you are texting your drug dealer the person who responds back may just be the police. [read post]
