Search for: "The Board of Regents of the University of Michigan" Results 41 - 60 of 86
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2013, 9:55 am by Melissa Hart
Here is the crux of the respondents’ argument, accepted by the Sixth Circuit:  if an applicant to the University of Michigan believes that legacy status or some other non-race-related quality should be taken into account in admissions, he can petition the Board of Regents to include that quality as a factor to be considered in admissions. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 10:45 am by Cornell Law Library
. -- Ann Arbor : University of Michigan Press, c2012. [read post]
29 Jan 2008, 1:14 pm
Let's review briefly the disaster that was the first round of the University of Iowa search to replace David Skorton, who was driven off by the Board of Regents. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 7:03 am by Bruce Khula
  There is certainly no shortage of briefing to read: in addition to the petitioner’s brief (PDF) and the briefs of the three respondents — Regents of the University of Michigan (PDF), Board of Governors of Wayne State University (PDF) and Chase Cantrell, et al. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 4:44 pm by Amy Howe
Strawbridge urged the justices to overrule Grutter and Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
 Notable individuals and organizations supported the ballton measure, including several labor unions, the University of California Board of Regents, the Anti-Defamation League, Facebook, and Wells Fargo. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 4:38 am by Guest Author
In conclusion, let me stress again that: (1) I don’t speak for the University of Michigan, (2) there are fair arguments that the no-scouting rule doesn’t violate the antitrust laws, and (3) Michigan should be held to high ethical standards. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 1:30 pm by Frank J. Fanshawe
On January 14, 2020, the Board of Regents formally adopted the Regulations (which were modified since their initial publication). [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 12:27 pm by Gail Heriot and John Eastman
  Justice O’Connor’s majority opinion recognized (as it had to) that the University of Michigan Law School’s admissions policy was racially discriminatory and therefore must be subjected to strict scrutiny. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 5:03 am by Joy Waltemath
University of Michigan Board of Regents, argued that her sex-plus claim failed because she could not identify any male comparators (single or married) with children who were treated differently than she was. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 5:03 am by Greg Lukianoff
Board of Regents of U. of Wisconsin, the UWM Post was not a party to any of the nine times the University of Wisconsin-Madison speech code had reportedly been enforced, but still had standing to bring a facial challenge. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 2:28 pm by Alexandra Seymour
In deciding the Harvard and UNC cases, the Supreme Court will decide whether to overturn its decision in Regents of University of California v. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 10:00 pm by Jim Sedor
Burgess argued that as a nonprofit board, members did not fall under the Political Reform Act. [read post]
20 May 2021, 9:03 pm by Katelynn Catalano
The University of California Board of Regents announced that its schools will not consider SAT or ACT scores in admissions or scholarship decisions for in-state freshman applications through fall 2024. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 2:09 pm by Jeanne Long
Finally, the Court held that McClain v University of Michigan Board of Regents, 256 Mich App 492 (2003), which allowed a plaintiff to bring an action for damages in her own right as a result of a miscarriage, remains good law. [read post]