Search for: "The Board of Regents of the University of Michigan" Results 41 - 60 of 86
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2018, 12:31 pm by Theodore Shaw
Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy’s announced retirement came one day short of the 40th anniversary of Board of Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 2:54 am by NCC Staff
On June 26, 1978, the Supreme Court ruled in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 11:17 am by Catherine Fisk
State Bar of California), and compulsory student-activity fees because public universities use them to fund all student activities (Board of Regents v. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 5:03 am by Joy Waltemath
University of Michigan Board of Regents, argued that her sex-plus claim failed because she could not identify any male comparators (single or married) with children who were treated differently than she was. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 4:30 am by SHG
President, and I want to see a clear statement from all of you — beyond what the [Board of] Regents is requiring — before I’m even going to have a conversation with you about your budgets, presidents. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Donaldson), written by David Adler, President of the Sun Valley Institute, who is writing a book about the case.Via Indian Country Today: “The University of Oklahoma Board of Regents has named Dr. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
In 2003 a bare five-person Court majority allowed the University of Michigan law school (in Grutter v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 11:54 am by Will Field
Protest against the California Supreme Court’s decision in Bakke, Los Angeles, May 7, 1977 On June 26, 1978, the Supreme Court ruled in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 8:36 am by Eric Goldman
Additional cases have been filed by FIRE against Texas Tech University, Iowa State University, Western Michigan University, the University of Hawaii, and Ohio University. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 1:02 am by rhapsodyinbooks
In 1871, the Board of Regents ruled that women should be admitted on an equal basis with men. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 3:33 pm by Cynthia L. Hackerott
Supreme Court, in a 5-4 vote, upheld the University of Michigan’s consideration of race in its law school admissions policy (Grutter v Bollinger, 84 EPD ¶41,415). [read post]
At the core of this burden is the fact that, right now at public universities across Michigan, donors, athletic officials, religious organizations, and alumni have unfettered access to admissions committees and the Board of Regents to advocate that a university include their constituents in admissions decisions. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 6:44 am by Joy Waltemath
In Schuette v Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action v Regents of the University of Michigan (Dkt No 12-682), the Supreme Court will review an en banc Sixth Circuit decision that a voter-approved ban on government affirmative action in the state of Michigan, as it applies to race-conscious admissions policies in public colleges and universities, violated the Equal Protection Clause. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 7:03 am by Bruce Khula
  There is certainly no shortage of briefing to read: in addition to the petitioner’s brief (PDF) and the briefs of the three respondents — Regents of the University of Michigan (PDF), Board of Governors of Wayne State University (PDF) and Chase Cantrell, et al. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 9:55 am by Melissa Hart
Here is the crux of the respondents’ argument, accepted by the Sixth Circuit:  if an applicant to the University of Michigan believes that legacy status or some other non-race-related quality should be taken into account in admissions, he can petition the Board of Regents to include that quality as a factor to be considered in admissions. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 9:58 am by Michael F. Smith
  As even the universities acknowledge, all authority over them under the Michigan Constitution ultimately resides with the people. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 10:23 am by Ken White
Penn of Michigan State University or Erik Loomis of the University of Rhode Island, readers argue about whether taxpayer-funded public university professors should or can be fired for their speech. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 4:15 am by Scott A. McKeown
Other universities defending IPRs are The Board of Regents of the University of Michigan, and The Trustees of Colombia University. [read post]