Search for: "The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company " Results 61 - 69 of 69
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2011, 7:02 am by Irvin M. Freilich
After careful analysis of the Supreme Court’s 2009 decision in Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 5:11 pm
THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY; from Fort Bend County; 14th district (14-05-01106-CV, 237 SW3d 355, 06-21-07) (Justice O'Neill not sitting)08-0024 KENNETH HUTH v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 10:11 am by Robert Percival
On Wednesday, the Supreme Court will conclude its penultimate week of oral argument for the October Term 2013 by hearing an environmental case which poses a question of statutory interpretation that may not be as simple as it first appears. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 10:37 am by Lorene Park
Also, they were employees of a company that contracted with the grove owner, not of the church or an “independent contractor” hired to fulfill the contract. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 2:52 pm
Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway CompanyState RoundupAL> DECIDED · Defendant wins all/part of 4 Motions in Limine in retaliation/discharge action in Taheri v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 7:32 pm by Schachtman
Confounding in the Lower Courts To some extent, lower courts, especially in the federal court system, got the message: Rule 702 required them to think about the evidence, and to consider threats to validity. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
The first edition of “Petitions to Watch” for the October 2008 term features cases up for consideration at the Justices’ opening conference of September 29. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am by Steven M. Taber
Under EPCRA regulations, companies of certain size are required to submit their annual reports to EPA and state authorities by listing the amounts of regulated chemicals that their facilities release into the environment through routine activities or as a result of accidents. [read post]