Search for: "The City of Pleasant Grove" Results 81 - 100 of 226
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2015, 11:40 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This doctrine gained attention a few years ago in the Pleasant Grove v. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 7:15 am
Supreme Court today in Pleasant Grove City v. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 12:38 pm
The constitutional issue, then, is whether, because Pleasant Grove City accepted the Ten Commandments monument, it must accept the Seven Aphorisms monument. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 10:42 am by Dave Maass
  Cal State Fullerton California Highway Patrol City of Arcadia City of Arcata City of Arroyo Grande City of Atwater City of Bell Gardens City of Benicia City of Beverly Hills City of Blythe City of Brea City of Brentwood City of Buena Park City of Burbank City of Burlingame City of Carlsbad City of Ceres City of Chino City of Chula Vista… [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 1:14 am
Pleasant Grove City, (10th Cir., April 17, 2007), the court of appeals held that Summum was entitled to a preliminary injunction permitting it to erect its monument in a city park that already featured a number of displays relating to the city's pioneer history as well as a 10 Commandments monument donated by the Fraternal Order of Eagles. [read post]
10 Aug 2008, 4:00 am
Mukasey (07-499) and Pleasant Grove City, UT v. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 9:22 am
(The petition is No. 07-665, Pleasant Grove City, Utah v. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 2:54 pm
Supreme Court to overturn a decision allowing a Utah religious group to erect its own monuments next to two displays of the Ten Commandments in Pleasant Grove and Duchesne cities. [read post]
15 Jun 2008, 4:00 am
Massachusetts (07-591), and Pleasant Grove City, UT v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 3:47 pm by Eugene Volokh
And this is so regardless of the references in various Supreme Court decisions to the government's power to engage in "government speech," e.g., in choosing which monuments to put up (Pleasant Grove City v. [read post]
2 May 2022, 10:51 am by Eugene Volokh
In Summum, we emphasized that Pleasant Grove City always selected which monuments it would place in its park (whether or not the government funded those monuments), and it typically took ownership over them. [read post]