Search for: "The New York Times Company et al v. United States Department of Justice"
Results 61 - 80
of 110
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2018, 4:07 pm
§§ 1481 and 1484, which require true and accurate information on invoices and entry documents.Government lawyers allege in United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 5:28 am
Wonderland AS (EPLAW) Uganda Uganda Trademark Bill passes (Afro-IP) United Kingdom 300th anniversary of Statute of Anne coming into force (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) (1709 Copyright Blog) (ipwars.com) (Securing Innovation) UK Pirate Party announces 2010 election lineup (TorrentFreak) United States US General US sees spate of IP policy activity (IP Watch) Justice Stevens to retire from Supreme Court (Inventive Step) (IPKat) US… [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
Halliburton Company, et al., No. 1:05-CV-1276 (D.D.C. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 3:39 pm
The New York State Legislature, for example, meticulously guarded the state’s sovereignty–an approach worthy of further review given that other states later emulated New York’s regulation of churches.[12] The legislature forced all churches, including the most wealthy and prominent denominations, to have their charters renewed or granted.[13] For some, this was far from a perfunctory process but rather… [read post]
1 May 2012, 12:58 pm
Under New York law, the no-action clause of a trust indenture barred noteholders' suit alleging that the corporation's issuance of a dividend and planned spin off a business were fraudulent transfers. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 4:34 am
http://j.st/SU6 United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:27 am
In particular, because of the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 4:47 am
The brief was filed in a joint effort by both the Department of Justice Solicitor’s office and the USPTO. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am
The Delaware Supreme Court[1] and federal courts in Florida,[2] New York,[3] Illinois[4] and Georgia[5] have made the BJR available to officers. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 4:05 pm
United States The Gu [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Brown and David Matusow, Bahr, et al. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 3:12 am
(IPKat) United States US General 2005 civil damages awards in state courts rarely broke $1M according to report released by US Justice Department (Law360) Changes to expert witness rules draws critisism (Law360) Collaborative law and intellectual property cases (The IP ADR Blog) Democrats victory could mean a new focus on civil suits (Law360) Election could drastically affect appeals court makeup (Law360) Ethics case survey: when is… [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 7:12 am
Steel Investment Canada Case On November 24, 2011, the Supreme Court of Canada denied leave in United States Steel Corporation et al. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2011, 11:54 am
Steel Investment Canada Case On November 24, 2011, the Supreme Court of Canada denied leave in United States Steel Corporation et al. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
In fact, such conduct is strictly forbidden for federal officials under the Hatch Act and as a matter of Justice Department policy. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
: Art, access and the public domain after Bridgeman v Corel’ – 29 April, New York City: (creativecommons.org), (Public Knowledge) US: ACI ‘Paragraph IV disputes’ conference – 30 April – 1 May, New York City: (Orange Book Blog) Pharma & Biotech Pharma & Biotech - General Canada: Patented Medicine Prices Review Board (PMPRB) departs from its guidelines in… [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
In a statement released Tuesday, the Justice Department and Environmental Protection Agency say the company also will install five new pieces of waste water equipment. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
The change was sparked by a decision by a federal judge in New York who ruled that the key verse in the song was not protected under copyright for lack of originality. [read post]
