Search for: "The Standard Fire Insurance Company et al" Results 21 - 40 of 88
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Nationwide, et al., North River sued several insurers in Georgia federal court alleging that those insurers are liable for amounts that North River paid to a flour producer in connection with millions of dollars of losses sustained in a voluntary recall of contaminated flour. [read post]
15 Jun 2019, 12:21 am by Public Employment Law Press
DUFFY, JJ.2016-09188 (Index No. 32465/09) Gail Arroyo, appellant, vCentral Islip UFSD, et al., respondents, et al., defendants.Law Offices of Wayne J. [read post]
3 May 2019, 1:00 pm by John Ross
The Fifth Circuit says no; here, "other legal processes" means processes that are similar to the ones listed, and criminal liability is quite different from garnishment, et al. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 6:51 am by Daniel Shaviro
         TAX POLITICSThe 1962 “rebellion” against dividend and interest withholding mainly took the form of a flood of letters, postcards, phone calls, et al flooding Congress, by reason of the dividend and interest withholding proposal. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 2:36 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Dwayne Edwards, et al., No. 17-cv-393 (D.N.J. filed Jan. 20, 2017),  SEC litigator Lee Greenwood filed a January 4, 2019 letter with a federal court in New Jersey informing the judge that the SEC beli [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am by Kevin LaCroix
National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA,[5] the court held that in order for there to be coverage under a fidelity bond, the losses must follow immediately from the employee’s conduct. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.) before adopting an ordinance enacting a voter-sponsored initiative pursuant to Elections Code section 9214, subdivision (a)? [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am by Kevin LaCroix
  With respect to the California statutory business judgment rule, the court observed that the statute provides that directors who perform their duties as directors in accordance with the statutory standards have no liability for failing to properly discharge their duties as such. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am by Kevin LaCroix
  With respect to the California statutory business judgment rule, the court observed that the statute provides that directors who perform their duties as directors in accordance with the statutory standards have no liability for failing to properly discharge their duties as such. [read post]