Search for: "The Supreme Court of the State of California"
Results 21 - 40
of 25,814
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
Supreme Court has imposed a three-part test to determine whether a work is obscene:the average person ... would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest;the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by the applicable state law; andthe work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.[5]The purpose of the third requirement is, as the Court… [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
Supreme Court has imposed a three-part test to determine whether a work is obscene:the average person ... would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest;the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by the applicable state law; andthe work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.[5]The purpose of the third requirement is, as the Court… [read post]
8 May 2024, 2:24 pm
Idaho State Tax Comm’n, the Idaho Supreme Court crafted a unique approach to agency deference in a case involving conflicting tax statutes. [read post]
8 May 2024, 2:00 pm
Plaintiffs would lose even in the current Supreme Court; fairly clearly, in my opinion.The only thing that surprised me, though, was who was suing.The plaintiffs themselves are John Does. [read post]
8 May 2024, 1:18 pm
On May 6, 2024, the California Supreme Court issued its decision in Naranjo v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 12:15 pm
The California Supreme Court notes that whether premium pay for missed meal breaks should be reported on wage statements as “wages” was unsettled when the case was tried between 2007-2009 and wasn’t settled until the California Supreme Court’s 2022 decision. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Rosenbaum, Amanda Mangaser Savage, Kathryn Eidmann and Sarah Camiscoli of the bar of the State of the State of LA, California, of counsel), for appellants.Letitia James, Attorney General, New York (Mark S. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Rosenbaum, Amanda Mangaser Savage, Kathryn Eidmann and Sarah Camiscoli of the bar of the State of the State of LA, California, of counsel), for appellants.Letitia James, Attorney General, New York (Mark S. [read post]
8 May 2024, 4:26 am
In a 1984 pornography case, Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart wrote “I shall not today attempt further to define [obscenity]. . . . [read post]
7 May 2024, 2:19 pm
California, the Supreme Court struck down a California law that made it a crime to bring or assist in bringing into the State any indigent person who was not a California resident. 314 U.S. 160 (1941). [read post]
7 May 2024, 10:44 am
(Or at least the best one that doesn't take up 20,000+ words.)The California Supreme Court has to wade into all this in deciding this opinion, which holds that, in this particular context, the required mental state of "knowing" is belied by a good faith belief in the legality of one's conduct. [read post]
7 May 2024, 6:30 am
Two years later, the California Supreme Court sided with peyote users who asserted that a state law prohibiting the use of peyote interfered with their right to freely exercise their religion. [read post]
6 May 2024, 10:00 pm
For L&E-specific podcasts, see: The Metaverse and L&E Podcast (Tim Taylor) Recent Supreme Court Rulings Impacting Labor & Employment Podcast (Tim Taylor) The Court Closes with LGBTQ Rights and Biden Debt Plan Podcast (Law 360) The Supreme Court Guts Affirmative Action Podcast (Law 360) Want the Sabbath Off? [read post]
6 May 2024, 5:10 pm
Jackson Women's Health Org., the United States Supreme Court held that the U.S. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:58 am
SEC, No. 20-61007 (5th Cir. 2020), a case currently under review at the United States Supreme Court, which similarly assesses the SEC’s powers in enforcing securities law. [read post]
6 May 2024, 8:44 am
Supreme Court review. [read post]
6 May 2024, 6:30 am
It pales in comparison to the innovative state supreme court decisions and restrictive SCOTUS cases Pozen deftly weaves through, but it says something about the efficacy (or lack thereof) of drug policy experts—a group that also includes the non-profit organizations cataloged in the book. [read post]
6 May 2024, 4:00 am
Pedrioli, In re Marriage Cases, Same-Sex Marriage, and the California Supreme Court as Critical Social Movement Ally, (33 S. [read post]
6 May 2024, 3:00 am
Supreme Court decision. [read post]
4 May 2024, 4:00 am
California lost about 264,500 fewer people to other states last year than in 2021. [read post]
