Search for: "The Supreme Court of the State of California"
Results 41 - 60
of 25,814
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2024, 4:00 am
California lost about 264,500 fewer people to other states last year than in 2021. [read post]
3 May 2024, 12:30 pm
This time though the matter concerns rates in California, not New York. [read post]
3 May 2024, 6:30 am
Reilly, where the Supreme court invalidated restrictions on tobacco products on First Amendment grounds.[8] One might assume that tobacco products have avoided meaningful regulation because of their widespread use and lobbying by politically powerful tobacco companies. [read post]
3 May 2024, 4:00 am
For example, the famous 1976 California Supreme Court case of Tarasoff v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 3:04 am
The discussion begins with two lengthy quotes from the Supreme Court’s opinion in Valdez v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 3:00 am
He continued to fight the outcome, and the state Supreme Court took his appeal. [read post]
3 May 2024, 12:15 am
Because the Court of Appeals applied the “family resemblance” test established by the Supreme Court in Reves v. [read post]
2 May 2024, 9:05 pm
The ban took on increased importance following an April 2024 Arizona Supreme Court ruling that it should be enforced over the state’s more recently enacted 15-week ban. [read post]
2 May 2024, 1:03 pm
Justice Corrigan authors a powerful opinion that holds that it's not permissible for the police to conduct a Terry stop just because someone's in a high crime area and pretending to tie his shoe behind a car in order to avoid the police, and Justice Evan authors an equally powerful concurrence (joined by a majority of the Court) that highlights the racial implications of a rule that assumes that the "normal" response to a police encounter is to welcome and/or… [read post]
1 May 2024, 9:59 pm
Supreme Court on a petition of certiorari. [read post]
1 May 2024, 9:01 pm
In the many cases (at the lower courts and the Supreme Court) upholding parts or all of regulations and court injunctions limiting protestor activity near clinic entrances and procedure rooms, noise has been one of the factors courts have held can be meaningfully taken into account by regulators because the noise itself interferes with a clinic’s function, and that harm must be considered alongside the interests of the protestors.CleanlinessAnother… [read post]
1 May 2024, 9:31 am
She has taught at the University of Hong Kong and the University of Pennsylvania, and held fellowships at Harvard, Princeton, and the University of California. [read post]
1 May 2024, 7:52 am
The measure was prompted by the Alabama Supreme Court ruling in February temporarily halting in vitro fertilization in that state and prompting lawmakers there to hastily pass legislation restarting it ( SB 159 ). ( LOUISIANA ILLUMINATOR , ALABAMA REFLECTOR , LEXISNEXIS STATE NET) MI Bills Would Allow Pharmacists to Prescribe Hormonal Birth Control Michigan lawmakers are considering a pair of bills aimed at improving access to hormonal birth control. [read post]
1 May 2024, 3:00 am
Supreme Court, have shown deference to doctors over law enforcement in other recent cases to do with prescribing medicine, including powerful opioids. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 11:30 am
Legally, it only makes "recommendations" to the California Supreme Court. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 9:00 am
Read More » Tags: Supreme Court, Takings, Takings Clause, United States Supreme Court [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 6:08 am
For similar reasons, Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Juan Merchan refused to admit a seemingly damning text message that the Enquirer’s top editor sent to a close relative on Election Day 2016, as Trump inched closer to the White House. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 10:00 pm
For L&E-specific podcasts, see: The Metaverse and L&E Podcast (Tim Taylor) Recent Supreme Court Rulings Impacting Labor & Employment Podcast (Tim Taylor) The Court Closes with LGBTQ Rights and Biden Debt Plan Podcast (Law 360) The Supreme Court Guts Affirmative Action Podcast (Law 360) Want the Sabbath Off? [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
(The status of the fighting-words doctrine itself is not clear today: it hasn’t been invoked by the Supreme Court in a long time to permit punishing a speaker rather than the person who throws the first punch.)Perhaps, then, Tinker’s “disruption” test should not permit punishment of speech that reasonable people should respond to without creating disruption or disturbance. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 12:26 pm
The California Supreme Court should grant review of this Court of Appeal opinion. [read post]