Search for: "The Supreme Court of the State of California"
Results 81 - 100
of 25,814
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2024, 2:49 pm
California, holding that the Eighth Amendment’s ban on cruel and unusual punishment prohibited the state from making it a crime simply to be a drug addict in California, even if there was no proof that the defendant had ever used drugs in the state. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 11:16 am
California, 413 U.S. 15, 24 (1973). [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 11:12 am
Maine, 527 U.S. 706, 728 (1999), the Supreme Court of the United States held that the doctrine was adopted by our country’s Founders in the Constitution itself rather than the Eleventh Amendment, solidifying its place in American jurisprudence. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 9:50 am
” Shah pointed to a California Supreme Court case (Schachter v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 3:59 am
California, in which the Supreme Court held that laws imposing penalties on people for narcotics addiction violated the Eighth Amendment because they punished a state of being, not a specific action, like drug possession or sale. [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 2:35 pm
While agreeing with much of the district court’s well-stated decision, we must reverse because we conclude the court lacked personal jurisdiction over MSC. [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 9:49 am
CSI Electrical Contractors and issued from the Supreme Court of California. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 6:52 pm
" And the Supreme Court stated in D.C. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 11:33 am
As recognized by the California Supreme Court, this is an unwaivable right by employees. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 11:00 am
California, the city continues, the Supreme Court held that the Eighth Amendment’s ban on cruel and unusual punishment prohibited the state from making it a crime simply to be a drug addict in California, even if there was no proof that the defendant had ever used drugs in the state. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 3:00 am
Supreme Court Weighs New Bribery Case as More Clashes Are Brewing MSN – Jan Wolfe and C. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 7:49 pm
“To date, neither the Supreme Court nor any of our sister circuits have addressed whether the compelled use of a biometric to unlock an electronic device is testimonial. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 2:14 pm
There are some piecemeal attempts at data protection for healthcare workers in more protective states like California (one which we’ve covered). [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 12:32 pm
Similarly, the Supreme Court ruled just a few years ago that California had to compensate employers after it forced them to let union representatives access their property. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 12:13 pm
"To date, neither the Supreme Court nor any of our sister circuits have addressed whether the compelled use of a biometric to unlock an electronic device is testimonial. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 8:49 am
Supreme Court decision updated the federal religious accommodation test in Groff v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 7:31 am
Code, § 5909 based upon Supreme Court holdings that a summary denial of a petition for reconsideration is inconsistent with Lab. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
A year ago, almost to the day, my (co-authored) Verdict column focused on the lessons to be learned from a high-profile and boisterous protest by Stanford Law School students at a Federalist Society Speaker Event featuring Judge Kyle Duncan, a conservative Trump-appointed judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 4:26 pm
THE ISSUE THE SUPREME COURT IS TAKING UP TODAY? [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 1:58 pm
Supreme Court decisions in Nollan v. [read post]
