Search for: "Think Computer Corporation v. Square, Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 28
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2023, 5:01 am
But I don't think that such costs are sufficient to justify an AI company's refusing to do this. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 10:42 am
Maui Jim, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 11:41 am
Facebook, Inc., 18-CV-07041-LHK (N.D. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 2:50 pm
Moreover, when the Board is indecisive even about deciding such a basic issues as whether a person engaged in case management should be on the presiding panel (which should be avoided at all costs, as is the case in the Federal Court as every experienced Federal Court lawyer knows well), it’s hard to imagine how the Board would be thinking about bringing in the concept of amicus curiae or “assessors” – which would be admittedly unusual but arguably within the realm… [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Both disciplines are about thinking (although some claim that philosophy involves thinking in slow motion while lawyering is thinking at top speed). [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 4:33 pm
Indeed, any enforcement actions against the perpetrators of the EDGAR hack would fall squarely within the recently chartered territory of outsider trading. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 3:59 am
Arnold J’s view was that, like “computer software” and “telecommunications services”, it is arguable that FIL’s trade marks are invalid so far as they are registered for “financial services” on the basis that this term lacks clarity and precision. [read post]
7 Jan 2018, 8:15 pm
While these computers don’t yet talk the way do, it did have me thinking about the expression rights that might be protected by the Charter. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 4:50 pm
2005: SEC v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 9:03 am
Quill Corporation v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 9:42 am
But it's hard to think of a case about design patents that would be more likely than Apple v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
The conflicts are most acute when one country’s legal prohibitions on producing data in response to surveillance directives cannot be squared with another country’s legal compulsions to do so. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 1:29 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 5:47 pm
" U.S. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 6:53 am
PLIVA, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 1:11 am
Microsoft Corporation (Patent Arcade) Righthaven – Newspaper chain fights for copyright troll’s survival (ArsTechnica) Square Enix - new case: Deus Ex preview leaked: Square Enix Limited v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 6:07 pm
Check to see whether you think there might be a violation. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 6:07 pm
Check to see whether you think there might be a violation. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 2:06 am
Random House, Inc.[10] and in New Era Publications Int'l v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 1:44 am
Int’l, Inc. v. [read post]
