Search for: "Third Judicial District of the State of Montana"
Results 41 - 60
of 114
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2010, 3:02 pm
Like more than a third of U.S. states, Arizona delegates to counties the responsibility of providing counsel to indigent criminal defendants. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 6:21 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia ruled in favor of the plaintiffs (Humane Society of the United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 4:42 am
The Eleventh Amendment states: 8 The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State. 9 U.S. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 7:18 am
On August 11, 2015, law enforcement officials obtained a third and final warrant (the `Residential Warrant’) from Magistrate Judge Bowler in this District to search Levin's home. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 6:42 am
United States (whether a district court may direct that a criminal defendant’s sentence run consecutively with a yet-to-be-imposed sentence that the defendant is expected to receive for a state crime). [read post]
18 May 2015, 5:44 am
There may be licensing requirements for private process servers, as is the case in New York City, Alaska, Arizona, California, Illinois, Montana, Nevada, and Oklahoma. . . .Other jurisdictions, such as Georgia, require a court order allowing a private person to serve process. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 4:05 pm
A pragmatic approach to judicial review of informal guidance documents. 2 Faulkner L. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 2:50 pm
Medical aid in dying has been authorized in Washington, D.C. and seven states — Colorado, Hawai‘i, Montana, Oregon, Vermont, Washington, and California — although the California law currently is under legal challenge based on a technicality. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm
Paula Mitchell is a career federal judicial law clerk for Senior Circuit Judge Arthur L. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am
The existing Indian family exception is a judicially created doctrine holding that the ICWA does not apply to those Indian children who have never been a member of an Indian home or culture and probably never would be.[14] Prior to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians[15], many states adopted the existing Indian family exception. [read post]
2 May 2011, 8:09 am
In Monday’s one ruling on an argued case, the Court by a vote of 7-1 barred the state of Montana from pursuing before the Justices a claim that the state of Wyoming, which lies upstream on the Yellowstone River and tributaries from Montana, is using up too much water in the basin for irrigation purposes so that less flows downstream to Montana farmers and cattlemen. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 12:30 pm
Third Circuit: Yes. [read post]
4 May 2018, 12:30 pm
Third Circuit: No constitutional problem there. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 11:41 am
By statute or judicial decision, courts in many states interpret the state UMC and UDP laws in light of FTC decisions, including orders. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
Penn State Law, Course Descriptions. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 6:22 pm
District Court, Northern District of Ohio (Toledo). [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 9:39 am
” Third, Barr replaced the Senate-confirmed U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia with an interim head, Timothy Shea, who had previously been a senior counselor in Barr’s office. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 1:52 am
After the bank submitted its formal notice of claim, the insurer denied coverage for the claim and filed an action in the District of Montana seeking a judicial declaration that it owed no duty to indemnify the bank for any loss or expense incurred in the bank’s litigation with Pariser. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 10:44 am
The United States and Montana filed claims in Asarco’s bankruptcy proceeding, asserting joint and several liability claims under CERCLA. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 10:44 am
The United States and Montana filed claims in Asarco’s bankruptcy proceeding, asserting joint and several liability claims under CERCLA. [read post]
